TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of letermovir in off-label indications: Infectious Diseases Working Party of European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation retrospective study
AU - Styczyński, Jan
AU - Tridello, Gloria
AU - Xhaard, Alienor
AU - Medinger, Michael
AU - Mielke, Stephan
AU - Taskinen, Mervi
AU - Blijlevens, Nicole
AU - Rodriguez, M. Aranzazu Bermudez
AU - Solano, Carlos
AU - Nikolousis, Emmanouil
AU - Biffi, Alessandra
AU - Groll, Andreas H.
AU - Junghanss, Christian
AU - Tsirigotis, Panagiotis
AU - Lioure, Bruno
AU - Šrámek, Jiří
AU - Holler, Ernst
AU - Galaverna, Federica
AU - Fagioli, Franca
AU - Knelange, Nina
AU - Wendel, Lotus
AU - Gil, Lidia
AU - de la Camara, Rafael
AU - Mikulska, Malgorzata
AU - Ljungman, Per
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Letermovir (LMV) is licensed for prophylaxis of CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant adult CMV-seropositive patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, LMV brings potential for use in other clinical situations, outside the approved indication. The objective of the study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of the use of LMV in off-label indications in EBMT centers. A total of 49 patients were reported including 44 adults and 5 children. LMV was administered for: secondary prophylaxis (37 adults, 3 children), primary prophylaxis (2 children), pre-emptive treatment (5 adults), and therapy of CMV disease (2 adults; pneumonia, colitis). Cyclosporine was concomitantly used in 26 patients. Overall, LMV was used for a median 112 days (range: 10–473). Cumulative incidence of breakthrough infections during secondary prophylaxis was 10.1% (95% CI = 3.1–21.9). Prophylactic treatment with LMV resulted in 94.9% (95% CI = 81.0–98.7), and 81.9% (95% CI = 65.7–90.9) probability of, respectively, 60 and 120-day survival without CMV infection in patients receiving secondary prophylaxis. During therapy of CMV infection/disease, probability of 60 and 120-day overall survival was 100% and 71.4% (95% CI = 25.8–92.0), respectively. No breakthrough infection occurred in children on LMV prophylaxis. Adverse events were reported in 15/49 (30.4%) patients: the most common being nausea/vomiting (22.4%). In conclusion, the efficacy of the use of LMV as secondary prophylaxis was high, and the preliminary experience with the use of LMV for the treatment of patients with refractory CMV infection/disease was positive. Our data showed that higher dose or prolonged therapy did not result in increased rate of adverse events.
AB - Letermovir (LMV) is licensed for prophylaxis of CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant adult CMV-seropositive patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, LMV brings potential for use in other clinical situations, outside the approved indication. The objective of the study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of the use of LMV in off-label indications in EBMT centers. A total of 49 patients were reported including 44 adults and 5 children. LMV was administered for: secondary prophylaxis (37 adults, 3 children), primary prophylaxis (2 children), pre-emptive treatment (5 adults), and therapy of CMV disease (2 adults; pneumonia, colitis). Cyclosporine was concomitantly used in 26 patients. Overall, LMV was used for a median 112 days (range: 10–473). Cumulative incidence of breakthrough infections during secondary prophylaxis was 10.1% (95% CI = 3.1–21.9). Prophylactic treatment with LMV resulted in 94.9% (95% CI = 81.0–98.7), and 81.9% (95% CI = 65.7–90.9) probability of, respectively, 60 and 120-day survival without CMV infection in patients receiving secondary prophylaxis. During therapy of CMV infection/disease, probability of 60 and 120-day overall survival was 100% and 71.4% (95% CI = 25.8–92.0), respectively. No breakthrough infection occurred in children on LMV prophylaxis. Adverse events were reported in 15/49 (30.4%) patients: the most common being nausea/vomiting (22.4%). In conclusion, the efficacy of the use of LMV as secondary prophylaxis was high, and the preliminary experience with the use of LMV for the treatment of patients with refractory CMV infection/disease was positive. Our data showed that higher dose or prolonged therapy did not result in increased rate of adverse events.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097250155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097250155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097250155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097250155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097250155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097250155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41409-020-01166-w
DO - 10.1038/s41409-020-01166-w
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097250155
SN - 0268-3369
JO - Bone Marrow Transplantation
JF - Bone Marrow Transplantation
ER -