TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards consensus on good practices for the use of new technologies for intervention and support in developmental dyslexia
T2 - A delphi study conducted among italian specialized professionals
AU - Lorusso, Maria Luisa
AU - Borasio, Francesca
AU - Da Rold, Martina
AU - Martinuzzi, Andrea
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was co-financed by the Erasmus+ program of the European Union through the 2018-1-ES01-KA201-050659 project. The work was further supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, Grant number RC2021 to M.L.L.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The use of new technologies for intervention in developmental dyslexia is steadily grow-ing. In order to better understand the needs, the expectations, and the attitudes of Italian expert health professionals concerning such technologies, a national survey was conducted applying the Delphi methodology. Ad-hoc questionnaires were sent out to a group of eighteen experts over three successive rounds, and anonymously collected responses were aggregated and shared with the group after each round, aiming to reach a consensus on the proposed response. The goal was to define a series of statements that could form the basis for international “good practices” in the use of technologies for intervention to support dyslexia in children and adolescents. In the first round, the experts’ general opinions were collected with both multiple choice and open questions, and in the second round consensus was assessed on a series of statements based on the first replies. The cut-off of 75% consensus on each statement was reached after three rounds. Fifteen experts completed all the rounds of the process, and a final version of the statements regarding good practice in the use of technologies for dyslexia could be defined.
AB - The use of new technologies for intervention in developmental dyslexia is steadily grow-ing. In order to better understand the needs, the expectations, and the attitudes of Italian expert health professionals concerning such technologies, a national survey was conducted applying the Delphi methodology. Ad-hoc questionnaires were sent out to a group of eighteen experts over three successive rounds, and anonymously collected responses were aggregated and shared with the group after each round, aiming to reach a consensus on the proposed response. The goal was to define a series of statements that could form the basis for international “good practices” in the use of technologies for intervention to support dyslexia in children and adolescents. In the first round, the experts’ general opinions were collected with both multiple choice and open questions, and in the second round consensus was assessed on a series of statements based on the first replies. The cut-off of 75% consensus on each statement was reached after three rounds. Fifteen experts completed all the rounds of the process, and a final version of the statements regarding good practice in the use of technologies for dyslexia could be defined.
KW - Augmented reality
KW - Delphi method
KW - Developmental dyslexia
KW - Good practices
KW - Intervention
KW - New technologies
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Virtual reality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121802560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121802560&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/children8121126
DO - 10.3390/children8121126
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121802560
SN - 2227-9067
VL - 8
JO - Child.
JF - Child.
IS - 12
M1 - 1126
ER -