TY - JOUR
T1 - Total body irradiation or chemotherapy conditioning in childhood all
T2 - A multinational, randomized, noninferiority phase III study
AU - IBFM Study Group
AU - IntReALL Study Group
AU - I-BFM SCT Study Group
AU - EBMT Paediatric Diseases Working Party
AU - Peters, Christina
AU - Dalle, Jean Hugues
AU - Locatelli, Franco
AU - Poetschger, Ulrike
AU - Sedlacek, Petr
AU - Buechner, Jochen
AU - Shaw, Peter J.
AU - Staciuk, Raquel
AU - Ifversen, Marianne
AU - Pichler, Herbert
AU - Vettenranta, Kim
AU - Svec, Peter
AU - Aleinikova, Olga
AU - Stein, Jerry
AU - Güngör, Tayfun
AU - Toporski, Jacek
AU - Truong, Tony H.
AU - Diaz-De-Heredia, Cristina
AU - Bierings, Marc
AU - Ariffin, Hany
AU - Essa, Mohammed
AU - Burkhardt, Birgit
AU - Schultz, Kirk
AU - Meisel, Roland
AU - Lankester, Arjan
AU - Ansari, Marc
AU - Schrappe, Martin
AU - von Stackelberg, Arend
AU - Balduzzi, Adriana
AU - Corbacioglu, Selim
AU - Bader, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Neovii, Medac, Riemser, and Children’s Cancer Research Institute.
Funding Information:
Supported by Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Neovii, Medac, Riemser, and Children's Cancer Research Institute. We would like to thank Helmut Gadner, who initiated and acted this study before his retirement; patients and families, nurses, and clinical research associates in participating countries; the SIRP-Study team in Vienna; the team of Marvin database in Hannover; and the data safety monitoring team: Andrea Bacigalupo (Italy), Eliane Gluckman (France), Paola de Lorenzo (Italy), and Michael Pulsipher (United States). We also thank F?d?ration Enfants et Sant? and Association Hubert Gouin, who supported the French study team, and Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Neovii, Medac, and Riemser for their financial support. Editorial support in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Dr Hannah Bridges of HB Health Comms Limited, funded by Medac.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Helmut Gadner, who initiated and acted this study before his retirement; patients and families, nurses, and clinical research associates in participating countries; the SIRP-Study team in Vienna; the team of Marvin database in Hannover; and the data safety monitoring team: Andrea Bacigalupo (Italy), Eliane Gluckman (France), Paola de Lorenzo (Italy), and Michael Pulsipher (United States). We also thank Fédération Enfants et Santé and Association Hubert Gouin, who supported the French study team, and Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Neovii, Medac, and Riemser for their financial support. Editorial support in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Dr Hannah Bridges of HB Health Comms Limited, funded by Medac.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - PURPOSE Total body irradiation (TBI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is efficacious, but long-term side effects are concerning. We investigated whether preparative combination chemotherapy could replace TBI in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS FORUM is a randomized, controlled, open-label, international, multicenter, phase III, noninferiority study. Patients # 18 years at diagnosis, 4-21 years at HSCT, in complete remission pre-HSCT, and with an HLA-compatible related or unrelated donor were randomly assigned to myeloablative conditioning with fractionated 12 Gy TBI and etoposide versus fludarabine, thiotepa, and either busulfan or treosulfan. The noninferiority margin was 8%. With 1,000 patients randomly assigned in 5 years, 2-year minimum follow-up, and one-sided alpha of 5%, 80% power was calculated. A futility stopping rule would halt random assignment if chemoconditioning was significantly inferior to TBI (EudraCT: 2012-003032-22; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949129). RESULTS Between April 2013 and December 2018, 543 patients were screened, 417 were randomly assigned, 212 received TBI, and 201 received chemoconditioning. The stopping rule was applied on March 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher following TBI (0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95; P,.0001) versus chemoconditioning (0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.17; P,.0001) and 0.02 (95% CI,, 0.01 to 0.05; P 5.0269) following TBI and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.40) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14) following chemoconditioning, respectively. CONCLUSION Improved OS and lower relapse risk were observed following TBI plus etoposide compared with chemoconditioning. We therefore recommend TBI plus etoposide for patients. 4 years old with high-risk ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT.
AB - PURPOSE Total body irradiation (TBI) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is efficacious, but long-term side effects are concerning. We investigated whether preparative combination chemotherapy could replace TBI in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS FORUM is a randomized, controlled, open-label, international, multicenter, phase III, noninferiority study. Patients # 18 years at diagnosis, 4-21 years at HSCT, in complete remission pre-HSCT, and with an HLA-compatible related or unrelated donor were randomly assigned to myeloablative conditioning with fractionated 12 Gy TBI and etoposide versus fludarabine, thiotepa, and either busulfan or treosulfan. The noninferiority margin was 8%. With 1,000 patients randomly assigned in 5 years, 2-year minimum follow-up, and one-sided alpha of 5%, 80% power was calculated. A futility stopping rule would halt random assignment if chemoconditioning was significantly inferior to TBI (EudraCT: 2012-003032-22; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01949129). RESULTS Between April 2013 and December 2018, 543 patients were screened, 417 were randomly assigned, 212 received TBI, and 201 received chemoconditioning. The stopping rule was applied on March 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 2.1 years. In the intention-to-treat population, 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher following TBI (0.91; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.95; P,.0001) versus chemoconditioning (0.75; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.81). Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse and treatment-related mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.17; P,.0001) and 0.02 (95% CI,, 0.01 to 0.05; P 5.0269) following TBI and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.40) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05 to 0.14) following chemoconditioning, respectively. CONCLUSION Improved OS and lower relapse risk were observed following TBI plus etoposide compared with chemoconditioning. We therefore recommend TBI plus etoposide for patients. 4 years old with high-risk ALL undergoing allogeneic HSCT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101058557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85101058557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.20.02529
DO - 10.1200/JCO.20.02529
M3 - Article
C2 - 33332189
AN - SCOPUS:85101058557
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 39
SP - 295
EP - 307
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -