TY - JOUR
T1 - Therapeutic cancer vaccines revamping
T2 - technology advancements and pitfalls
AU - Antonarelli, G.
AU - Corti, C.
AU - Tarantino, P.
AU - Ascione, L.
AU - Cortes, J.
AU - Romero, P.
AU - Mittendorf, E. A.
AU - Disis, M. L.
AU - Curigliano, G.
N1 - Funding Information:
GA contributed to the literature search, conception, and design of the article and drafted the first version of the manuscript. CC, PT, and LA contributed to the literature search, conception, and design of the article and provided critical revisions of the manuscript. GC contributed to conception and design of the article and provided critical revisions of the manuscript and supervision. Figures 1-3 were created with biorender.com. All the authors provided critical revisions of the manuscript and final approval to the submitted work. None declared. JC reports consulting/advisor fees or honoraria from: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Biothera Pharmaceutical, Merus, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Servier, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GSK, Novartis, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Guardanth health, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma C, and Queen Mary University of London. PR serves as consultant for MaxiVax, Enterome, and Inotrem. EAM is on the SAB for AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Celgene, Genentech, Genomic Health, Merck, Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, SELLAS Lifescience, and Tapimmune and has clinical trial support to her former institution (MDACC) from AstraZeneca/Medimmune, EMD-Serono, Galena Biopharma, and Genentech as well as Genentech support to a SU2C grant, as well as sponsored research support to the laboratory from GSK and Eli Lilly. MLD has stock ownership of VentiRX and Epithany. MLD has received grant funding from EMD Serono, VentiRx, Seattle Genetics, and Celgene. GC served as consultant or advisor for Roche, Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; served on the speaker's bureau for Roche, Pfizer, and Lilly; received travel funding from Pfizer and Roche; and received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, and SEAGEN, all outside the submitted work. EAM has been compensated for participation on SABs for Exact Sciences, Merch and Roche, and uncompensated participation on steering committees for BMS, Lilly, and Roche. The remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
JC reports consulting/advisor fees or honoraria from: Roche, Celgene, Cellestia, AstraZeneca, Biothera Pharmaceutical, Merus, Seattle Genetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Erytech, Athenex, Polyphor, Lilly, Servier, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GSK, Novartis, Eisai, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Baxalta GMBH/Servier Affaires, Bayer healthcare, Guardanth health, Piqur Therapeutics, Puma C, and Queen Mary University of London. PR serves as consultant for MaxiVax, Enterome, and Inotrem. EAM is on the SAB for AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Celgene, Genentech, Genomic Health, Merck, Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, SELLAS Lifescience, and Tapimmune and has clinical trial support to her former institution (MDACC) from AstraZeneca/Medimmune, EMD-Serono, Galena Biopharma, and Genentech as well as Genentech support to a SU2C grant, as well as sponsored research support to the laboratory from GSK and Eli Lilly. MLD has stock ownership of VentiRX and Epithany. MLD has received grant funding from EMD Serono, VentiRx, Seattle Genetics, and Celgene. GC served as consultant or advisor for Roche, Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; served on the speaker's bureau for Roche, Pfizer, and Lilly; received travel funding from Pfizer and Roche; and received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Lilly, Novartis, and SEAGEN, all outside the submitted work. EAM has been compensated for participation on SABs for Exact Sciences, Merch and Roche, and uncompensated participation on steering committees for BMS, Lilly, and Roche. The remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Cancer vaccines (CVs) represent a long-sought therapeutic and prophylactic immunotherapy strategy to obtain antigen (Ag)-specific T-cell responses and potentially achieve long-term clinical benefit. However, historically, most CV clinical trials have resulted in disappointing outcomes, despite promising signs of immunogenicity across most formulations. In the past decade, technological advances regarding vaccine delivery platforms, tools for immunogenomic profiling, and Ag/epitope selection have occurred. Consequently, the ability of CVs to induce tumor-specific and, in some cases, remarkable clinical responses have been observed in early-phase clinical trials. It is notable that the record-breaking speed of vaccine development in response to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic mainly relied on manufacturing infrastructures and technological platforms already developed for CVs. In turn, research, clinical data, and infrastructures put in place for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic can further speed CV development processes. This review outlines the main technological advancements as well as major issues to tackle in the development of CVs. Possible applications for unmet clinical needs will be described, putting into perspective the future of cancer vaccinology.
AB - Cancer vaccines (CVs) represent a long-sought therapeutic and prophylactic immunotherapy strategy to obtain antigen (Ag)-specific T-cell responses and potentially achieve long-term clinical benefit. However, historically, most CV clinical trials have resulted in disappointing outcomes, despite promising signs of immunogenicity across most formulations. In the past decade, technological advances regarding vaccine delivery platforms, tools for immunogenomic profiling, and Ag/epitope selection have occurred. Consequently, the ability of CVs to induce tumor-specific and, in some cases, remarkable clinical responses have been observed in early-phase clinical trials. It is notable that the record-breaking speed of vaccine development in response to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic mainly relied on manufacturing infrastructures and technological platforms already developed for CVs. In turn, research, clinical data, and infrastructures put in place for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic can further speed CV development processes. This review outlines the main technological advancements as well as major issues to tackle in the development of CVs. Possible applications for unmet clinical needs will be described, putting into perspective the future of cancer vaccinology.
KW - cancer
KW - immunotherapies
KW - vaccines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116047702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116047702&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2153
DO - 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.2153
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34500046
AN - SCOPUS:85116047702
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 32
SP - 1537
EP - 1551
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 12
ER -