TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of basic plan parameters on calculated small field output factors - A multicenter study
AU - Falco, Maria Daniela
AU - Fusella, Marco
AU - Clemente, Stefania
AU - Fiandra, Christian
AU - Gallio, Elena
AU - Garibaldi, Cristina
AU - Bagalà, Paolo
AU - Borzì, Giuseppina
AU - Casale, Michelina
AU - Casati, Marta
AU - Consorti, Rita
AU - Delana, Anna
AU - Esposito, Marco
AU - Malatesta, Tiziana
AU - Menghi, Enrico
AU - Reggiori, Giacomo
AU - Russo, Serenella
AU - Stasi, Michele
AU - Mancosu, Pietro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - PURPOSE: The influence of basic plan parameters such as slice thickness, grid resolution, algorithm type and field size on calculated small field output factors (OFs) was evaluated in a multicentric study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three computational homogeneous water phantoms with slice thicknesses (ST) 1, 2 and 3 mm were shared among twenty-one centers to calculate OFs for 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 cm2 field sizes (FSs) (normalized to 10x10 cm2 FS), with their own treatment planning system (TPS) and the energy clinically used for stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery. OFs were calculated for each combination of grid resolution (GR) (1, 2 and 3 mm) and ST and finally compared with the OFs measured for the TPS commissioning. A multivariate analysis was performed to test the effect of basic plan parameters on calculated OFs. RESULTS: A total of 509 data points were collected. Calculated OFs are slightly higher than measured ones. The multivariate analysis showed that Center, GR, algorithm type, and FS are predictive variables of the difference between calculated and measured OFs (p < 0.001). As FS decreases, the spread in the difference between calculated and measured OFs became larger when increasing the GR. Monte Carlo and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithms, presented a dependence on GR (p < 0.01), while Collapsed Cone Convolution and Acuros did not. The effect of the ST was found to be negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Modern TPSs slightly overestimate the calculated small field OFs compared with measured ones. Grid resolution, algorithm, center number and field size influence the calculation of small field OFs.
AB - PURPOSE: The influence of basic plan parameters such as slice thickness, grid resolution, algorithm type and field size on calculated small field output factors (OFs) was evaluated in a multicentric study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three computational homogeneous water phantoms with slice thicknesses (ST) 1, 2 and 3 mm were shared among twenty-one centers to calculate OFs for 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3 cm2 field sizes (FSs) (normalized to 10x10 cm2 FS), with their own treatment planning system (TPS) and the energy clinically used for stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery. OFs were calculated for each combination of grid resolution (GR) (1, 2 and 3 mm) and ST and finally compared with the OFs measured for the TPS commissioning. A multivariate analysis was performed to test the effect of basic plan parameters on calculated OFs. RESULTS: A total of 509 data points were collected. Calculated OFs are slightly higher than measured ones. The multivariate analysis showed that Center, GR, algorithm type, and FS are predictive variables of the difference between calculated and measured OFs (p < 0.001). As FS decreases, the spread in the difference between calculated and measured OFs became larger when increasing the GR. Monte Carlo and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithms, presented a dependence on GR (p < 0.01), while Collapsed Cone Convolution and Acuros did not. The effect of the ST was found to be negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Modern TPSs slightly overestimate the calculated small field OFs compared with measured ones. Grid resolution, algorithm, center number and field size influence the calculation of small field OFs.
KW - Dose calculation algorithm
KW - Grid resolution
KW - Output factors
KW - Slice thickness
KW - TPS commissioning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115449765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115449765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 34217003
AN - SCOPUS:85115449765
SN - 1120-1797
VL - 88
SP - 98
EP - 103
JO - Physica Medica
JF - Physica Medica
ER -