TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of gender on electrical therapies for the heart
T2 - Procedural considerations, results and complications
AU - Diemberger, Igor
AU - Marazzi, Raffaella
AU - Casella, Michela
AU - Vassanelli, Francesca
AU - Galimberti, Paola
AU - Luzi, Mario
AU - Borrelli, Alessio
AU - Soldati, Ezio
AU - Golzio, Pier Giorgio
AU - Fumagalli, Stefano
AU - Francia, Pietro
AU - Padeletti, Luigi
AU - Botto, Gianluca
AU - Boriani, Giuseppe
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Use of cardiac implantable devices and catheter ablation is steadily increasing in Western countries following the positive results of clinical trials. Despite the advances in scientific knowledge, tools development, and techniques improvement we still have some grey area in the field of electrical therapies for the heart. In particular, several reports highlighted differences both in medical behaviour and procedural outcomes between female and male candidates. Women are referred later for catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, leading to suboptimal results. On the opposite females present greater response to cardiac resynchronization, while the benefit of implantable defibrillator in primary prevention seems to be less pronounced. Differences on aetiology, clinical profile, and development of myocardial scarring are the more plausible causes. This review will discuss all these aspects together with gender-related differences in terms of acute/late complications. We will also provide useful hints on plausible mechanisms and practical procedural aspects.
AB - Use of cardiac implantable devices and catheter ablation is steadily increasing in Western countries following the positive results of clinical trials. Despite the advances in scientific knowledge, tools development, and techniques improvement we still have some grey area in the field of electrical therapies for the heart. In particular, several reports highlighted differences both in medical behaviour and procedural outcomes between female and male candidates. Women are referred later for catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation, leading to suboptimal results. On the opposite females present greater response to cardiac resynchronization, while the benefit of implantable defibrillator in primary prevention seems to be less pronounced. Differences on aetiology, clinical profile, and development of myocardial scarring are the more plausible causes. This review will discuss all these aspects together with gender-related differences in terms of acute/late complications. We will also provide useful hints on plausible mechanisms and practical procedural aspects.
KW - Ablation
KW - Arrhythmia
KW - CIED
KW - Defibrillator
KW - Gender
KW - Review
KW - Sex
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042283991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042283991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/europace/eux034
DO - 10.1093/europace/eux034
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85042283991
SN - 1099-5129
VL - 19
SP - 1911
EP - 1921
JO - Europace
JF - Europace
IS - 12
ER -