TY - JOUR
T1 - The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging
T2 - A position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology
AU - Picano, Eugenio
AU - Vañó, Eliseo
AU - Rehani, Madan M.
AU - Cuocolo, Alberto
AU - Mont, Lluis
AU - Bodi, Vicente
AU - Bar, Olivier
AU - Maccia, Carlo
AU - Pierard, Luc
AU - Sicari, Rosa
AU - Plein, Sven
AU - Mahrholdt, Heiko
AU - Lancellotti, Patrizio
AU - Knuuti, Juhani
AU - Heidbuchel, Hein
AU - Di Mario, Carlo
AU - Badano, Luigi P.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The benefits of cardiac imaging are immense, and modern medicine requires the extensive and versatile use of a variety of cardiac imaging techniques. Cardiologists are responsible for a large part of the radiation exposures every person gets per year from all medical sources. Therefore, they have a particular responsibility to avoid unjustified and non-optimized use of radiation, but sometimes are imperfectly aware of the radiological dose of the examination they prescribe or practice. This position paper aims to summarize the current knowledge on radiation effective doses (and risks) related to cardiac imaging procedures. We have reviewed the literature on radiation doses, which can range from the equivalent of 1-60 milliSievert (mSv) around a reference dose average of 15 mSv (corresponding to 750 chest X-rays) for a percutaneous coronary intervention, a cardiac radiofrequency ablation, a multidetector coronary angiography, or a myocardial perfusion imaging scintigraphy. We provide a European perspective on the best way to play an active role in implementing into clinical practice the key principle of radiation protection that: 'each patient should get the right imaging exam, at the right time, with the right radiation dose'.
AB - The benefits of cardiac imaging are immense, and modern medicine requires the extensive and versatile use of a variety of cardiac imaging techniques. Cardiologists are responsible for a large part of the radiation exposures every person gets per year from all medical sources. Therefore, they have a particular responsibility to avoid unjustified and non-optimized use of radiation, but sometimes are imperfectly aware of the radiological dose of the examination they prescribe or practice. This position paper aims to summarize the current knowledge on radiation effective doses (and risks) related to cardiac imaging procedures. We have reviewed the literature on radiation doses, which can range from the equivalent of 1-60 milliSievert (mSv) around a reference dose average of 15 mSv (corresponding to 750 chest X-rays) for a percutaneous coronary intervention, a cardiac radiofrequency ablation, a multidetector coronary angiography, or a myocardial perfusion imaging scintigraphy. We provide a European perspective on the best way to play an active role in implementing into clinical practice the key principle of radiation protection that: 'each patient should get the right imaging exam, at the right time, with the right radiation dose'.
KW - Cancer
KW - Cardiovascular disease
KW - Imaging
KW - Radiation
KW - Radiological protection
KW - Risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897128476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897128476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/eht394
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/eht394
M3 - Article
C2 - 24401558
AN - SCOPUS:84897128476
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 35
SP - 665
EP - 672
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 10
ER -