TY - JOUR
T1 - Storage and retrieval of addition facts
T2 - The role of number comparison
AU - Butterworth, Brian
AU - Zorzi, Marco
AU - Girelli, Luisa
AU - Jonckheere, A. R.
PY - 2001/11
Y1 - 2001/11
N2 - It is proposed that arithmetical facts are organized in memory in terms of a principle that is unique to numbers - the cardinal magnitudes of the addends. This implies that sums such as 4 + 2 and 2 + 4 are represented, and searched for, in terms of the maximum and minimum addends. This in turn implies that a critical stage in solving an addition problem is deciding which addend is the larger. The COMP model of addition fact retrieval incorporates a comparison stage, as well as a retrieval stage and a pronunciation stage. Three tasks, using the same subjects, were designed to assess the contribution of these three stages to retrieving the answers to single-digit addition problems. Task 3 was the addition task, which examined whether reaction times (RTs) were explained by the model; Task 1 was a number naming task to assess the contribution of the pronunciation stage; Task 2 was a magnitude comparison task to assess the contribution, if any, of the comparison stage. A regression equation that included just expressions of these three stages was found to account for 71% of the variance. It is argued that the COMP model fits not only the adult RT data better than do alternatives, but also the evidence from development of additional skills.
AB - It is proposed that arithmetical facts are organized in memory in terms of a principle that is unique to numbers - the cardinal magnitudes of the addends. This implies that sums such as 4 + 2 and 2 + 4 are represented, and searched for, in terms of the maximum and minimum addends. This in turn implies that a critical stage in solving an addition problem is deciding which addend is the larger. The COMP model of addition fact retrieval incorporates a comparison stage, as well as a retrieval stage and a pronunciation stage. Three tasks, using the same subjects, were designed to assess the contribution of these three stages to retrieving the answers to single-digit addition problems. Task 3 was the addition task, which examined whether reaction times (RTs) were explained by the model; Task 1 was a number naming task to assess the contribution of the pronunciation stage; Task 2 was a magnitude comparison task to assess the contribution, if any, of the comparison stage. A regression equation that included just expressions of these three stages was found to account for 71% of the variance. It is argued that the COMP model fits not only the adult RT data better than do alternatives, but also the evidence from development of additional skills.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035516312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035516312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02724980143000064
DO - 10.1080/02724980143000064
M3 - Article
C2 - 11765730
SN - 0272-4987
VL - 54
SP - 1005
EP - 1029
JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology
JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology
IS - 4
ER -