TY - JOUR
T1 - SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice
T2 - General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference
AU - Benedetti, Maria Grazia
AU - Beghi, Ettore
AU - De Tanti, Antonio
AU - Cappozzo, Aurelio
AU - Basaglia, Nino
AU - Cutti, Andrea Giovanni
AU - Cereatti, Andrea
AU - Stagni, Rita
AU - Verdini, Federica
AU - Manca, Mario
AU - Fantozzi, Silvia
AU - Mazzà, Claudia
AU - Camomilla, Valentina
AU - Campanini, Isabella
AU - Castagna, Anna
AU - Cavazzuti, Lorenzo
AU - Del Maestro, Martina
AU - Croce, Ugo Della
AU - Gasperi, Marco
AU - Leo, Tommaso
AU - Marchi, Pia
AU - Petrarca, Maurizio
AU - Piccinini, Luigi
AU - Rabuffetti, Marco
AU - Ravaschio, Andrea
AU - Sawacha, Zimi
AU - Spolaor, Fabiola
AU - Tesio, Luigi
AU - Vannozzi, Giuseppe
AU - Visintin, Isabella
AU - Ferrarin, Maurizio
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts’ opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.
AB - Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts’ opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.
KW - Amputation
KW - Amputee
KW - Brain injuries
KW - Cerebral pulsy
KW - Clinics
KW - Consensus conference
KW - EMG
KW - Force plate
KW - Gait analysis
KW - Human movement
KW - Kinematics
KW - Stereophotogrammetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027720070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027720070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85027720070
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 58
SP - 252
EP - 260
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
ER -