TY - JOUR
T1 - Second-line eribulin in triple negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Multicentre retrospective study: The TETRIS trial.
AU - Krasniqi, Eriseld
AU - Pizzuti, Laura
AU - Valerio, Maria Rosaria
AU - Capomolla, Elisabetta
AU - Botti, Claudio
AU - Sanguineti, Giuseppe
AU - Marchetti, Paolo
AU - Anselmi, Elisabetta
AU - Tomao, Silverio
AU - Giordano, Antonio
AU - Ficorella, Corrado
AU - Cannita, Katia
AU - Livi, Lorenzo
AU - Meattini, Icro
AU - Mauri, Maria
AU - Greco, Filippo
AU - Veltri, Enzo Maria
AU - Michelotti, Andrea
AU - Moscetti, Luca
AU - Giotta, Francesco
AU - Lorusso, Vito
AU - Paris, Ida
AU - Tomao, Federica
AU - Santini, Daniele
AU - Tonini, Giuseppe
AU - Villa, Alice
AU - Gebbia, Vittorio
AU - Gamucci, Teresa
AU - Ciliberto, Gennaro
AU - Sperduti, Isabella
AU - Mazzotta, Marco
AU - Barba, Maddalena
AU - Vici, Patrizia
N1 - Funding Information:
EK, MRV, EC, CB, GS, EA, ST, AG, CF, KC, LL, IM, FG, EMV, FG, VL, MMau, FT, DS, GT, AV, VG, IS, GC, MM and MB declare no conflict of interests. LP received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis; speaker fees from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili.PM has/had a consultant/advisory role for BMS, Roche Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, and Incyte. AM received travel grants from Eisai, Celgene, Novartis; personal fees, advisory boards from Eisai, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Teva, Pfizer, Celgene. LM received personal fees/advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Eisai, Pfizer. IP received personal fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Italfarmaco, Gentili, Pierre Fabre. TG received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis; speaker fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili, Lilly. PV received travel grants from Eisai, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis; speaker fees/advisory boards from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Gentili.
Publisher Copyright:
© The author(s).
PY - 2021/3/27
Y1 - 2021/3/27
N2 - Introduction: Large and consistent evidence supports the use of eribulin mesylate in clinical practice in third or later line treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Conversely, there is paucity of data on eribulin efficacy in second line treatment. Methods: We investigated outcomes of 44 mTNBC patients treated from 2013 through 2019 with second line eribulin mesylate in a multicentre retrospective study involving 14 Italian oncologic centres. Results: Median age was 51 years, with 11.4% of these patients being metastatic at diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from eribulin starting were 11.9 (95%CI: 8.4-15.5) and 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.7-5.3), respectively. We observed 8 (18.2%) partial responses and 10 (22.7%) patients had stable disease as best response. A longer PFS on previous first line treatment predicted a better OS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99, p= 0.038) and a longer PFS on eribulin treatment (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.85-0.98, p=0.018). Progression free survival to eribulin was also favorably influenced by prior adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p=0.02). Eribulin was generally well tolerated, with grade 3-4 adverse events being recorded in 15.9% of patients. Conclusions: The outcomes described for our cohort are consistent with those reported in the pivotal Study301 and subsequent observational studies. Further data from adequately-sized, ad hoc trials on eribulin use in second line for mTNBC are warranted to confirm our findings.
AB - Introduction: Large and consistent evidence supports the use of eribulin mesylate in clinical practice in third or later line treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Conversely, there is paucity of data on eribulin efficacy in second line treatment. Methods: We investigated outcomes of 44 mTNBC patients treated from 2013 through 2019 with second line eribulin mesylate in a multicentre retrospective study involving 14 Italian oncologic centres. Results: Median age was 51 years, with 11.4% of these patients being metastatic at diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from eribulin starting were 11.9 (95%CI: 8.4-15.5) and 3.5 months (95%CI: 1.7-5.3), respectively. We observed 8 (18.2%) partial responses and 10 (22.7%) patients had stable disease as best response. A longer PFS on previous first line treatment predicted a better OS (HR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99, p= 0.038) and a longer PFS on eribulin treatment (HR=0.92, 95%CI: 0.85-0.98, p=0.018). Progression free survival to eribulin was also favorably influenced by prior adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.44, 95%CI: 0.22-0.88, p=0.02). Eribulin was generally well tolerated, with grade 3-4 adverse events being recorded in 15.9% of patients. Conclusions: The outcomes described for our cohort are consistent with those reported in the pivotal Study301 and subsequent observational studies. Further data from adequately-sized, ad hoc trials on eribulin use in second line for mTNBC are warranted to confirm our findings.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Efficacy outcomes
KW - Eribulin mesylate
KW - Toxicity outcomes
KW - Triple negative metastatic breast cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104447600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104447600&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7150/ijms.54996
DO - 10.7150/ijms.54996
M3 - Article
C2 - 33859534
AN - SCOPUS:85104447600
SN - 1449-1907
VL - 18
SP - 2245
EP - 2250
JO - International Journal of Medical Sciences
JF - International Journal of Medical Sciences
IS - 10
ER -