TY - JOUR
T1 - Robot-assisted Surgery for Benign Ureteral Strictures
T2 - Experience and Outcomes from Four Tertiary Care Institutions
AU - Buffi, Nicolò
AU - Lughezzani, Giovanni
AU - Hurle, Rodolfo
AU - Lazzeri, Massimo
AU - Taverna, Gianluigi
AU - Bozzini, Giorgio
AU - Bertolo, Riccardo
AU - Checcucci, Enrico
AU - Porpiglia, Francesco
AU - Fossati, Nicola
AU - Gandaglia, Giorgio
AU - Larcher, Alessandro
AU - Suardi, Nazareno
AU - Montorsi, Francesco
AU - Lista, Giuliana
AU - Giorgio, Guazzoni
AU - Mottrie, Alexandre
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background: Minimally invasive treatment of benign ureteral strictures is still challenging because of its technical complexity. In this context, robot-assisted surgery may overcome the limits of the laparoscopic approach. Objective: To evaluate outcomes for robotic ureteral repair in a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral stricture (US) at four tertiary referral centres. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective study reports data for 183 patients treated with standard robot-assisted pyeloplasty (PYP) and robotic uretero-ureterostomy (UUY) at four high-volume centres from January 2006 to September 2014. Surgical procedure: Robotic PYP and robot-assisted UUY were performed according to previously reported surgical techniques. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and outcomes were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results and limitations: No robot-assisted UUY cases required surgical conversion, while 2.8% of PYP cases were not completed robotically. The median operative time was 120 and 150. min for robot-assisted PYP and robot-assisted UUY, respectively. No intraoperative complications were reported. The overall complication rate for all procedures was 11% (n=20) and complications were mostly of low grade. The high-grade complication rate was 2.2% (n=4). At median follow-up of 24 mo, the overall success rate was>90% for both procedures. The study limitations include its retrospective nature and the heterogeneity of the study population. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for benign US is safe and effective, with limited risk of high-grade complications and good intermediate-term results. Patient summary: In this study we review the use of robotic surgery at four different tertiary care centres in the treatment of patients affected by benign ureteral strictures. Our results demonstrate that robotic surgery is a safe alternative to the standard open approach in the treatment of ureteral strictures. The results of the current study confirm the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robotic surgery as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for the treatment of benign ureteral strictures.
AB - Background: Minimally invasive treatment of benign ureteral strictures is still challenging because of its technical complexity. In this context, robot-assisted surgery may overcome the limits of the laparoscopic approach. Objective: To evaluate outcomes for robotic ureteral repair in a multi-institutional cohort of patients treated for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral stricture (US) at four tertiary referral centres. Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective study reports data for 183 patients treated with standard robot-assisted pyeloplasty (PYP) and robotic uretero-ureterostomy (UUY) at four high-volume centres from January 2006 to September 2014. Surgical procedure: Robotic PYP and robot-assisted UUY were performed according to previously reported surgical techniques. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and outcomes were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results and limitations: No robot-assisted UUY cases required surgical conversion, while 2.8% of PYP cases were not completed robotically. The median operative time was 120 and 150. min for robot-assisted PYP and robot-assisted UUY, respectively. No intraoperative complications were reported. The overall complication rate for all procedures was 11% (n=20) and complications were mostly of low grade. The high-grade complication rate was 2.2% (n=4). At median follow-up of 24 mo, the overall success rate was>90% for both procedures. The study limitations include its retrospective nature and the heterogeneity of the study population. Conclusions: Robotic surgery for benign US is safe and effective, with limited risk of high-grade complications and good intermediate-term results. Patient summary: In this study we review the use of robotic surgery at four different tertiary care centres in the treatment of patients affected by benign ureteral strictures. Our results demonstrate that robotic surgery is a safe alternative to the standard open approach in the treatment of ureteral strictures. The results of the current study confirm the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robotic surgery as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for the treatment of benign ureteral strictures.
KW - Outcomes
KW - Reimplantation
KW - Robot-assisted surgery
KW - Surgical technique
KW - Ureter
KW - Ureteral strictures
KW - Ureteral surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997418942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997418942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.022
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84997418942
SN - 0302-2838
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
ER -