TY - JOUR
T1 - Retention rate of a second line with a biologic DMARD after failure of a first-line therapy with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab
T2 - results from the Italian GISEA registry
AU - Contributors
AU - Sebastiani, Marco
AU - Venerito, Vincenzo
AU - Bugatti, Serena
AU - Bazzani, Chiara
AU - Biggioggero, Martina
AU - Petricca, Luca
AU - Foti, Rosario
AU - Bortoluzzi, Alessandra
AU - Balduzzi, Silvia
AU - Visalli, Elisa
AU - Frediani, Bruno
AU - Manfredi, Andreina
AU - Gremese, Elisa
AU - Favalli, Ennio
AU - Iannone, Florenzo
AU - Ferraccioli, Gianfranco
AU - Lapadula, Giovanni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - OBJECTIVES: EULAR recommendations do not suggest which biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) should be preferred after failure of a first bDMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In particular, few data are available regarding the effectiveness of a second-line bDMARD after failure of abatacept (ABA), tocilizumab (TCZ), and rituximab (RTX). The aim of this study was to analyze the retention rate of a second line with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other mechanisms of action (MoAs), after the failure of either RTX, TCZ, or ABA. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-eight RA patients from the Italian GISEA registry were included in the study. RTX was the first bDMARD in 18% of patients, ABA in 45.7%, and TCZ in 36.3%, while the second bDMARD was a TNFi (group 1) in 129 patients and an agent with a different MoA (group 2) in 149. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 68), 129 patients discontinued their treatment; patients of group 1 discontinued the treatment more frequently than patients of group 2 (p<0.001) with retention rates of 33.6±5.7% and 63.6±4.6% after 104 weeks for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). At multivariate analysis, the mechanism of action was the only predictor for the maintenance in therapy. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, ABA, RTX, and TCZ seem to maintain a good retention rate also when used as a second-line therapy, suggesting their use after the failure of a non-TNFi as first-line therapy. However, specifically designed studies are needed to evaluate the more appropriate therapeutic strategies in RA, according to the first-line drug, including new targeted synthetic DMARDs. Key Points • A large proportion of rheumatoid arthritis patients fail the first biologic DMARD. • Few data are available about the efficacy of biologic DMARD after the failure of a non-TNF inhibitor. • Abatacept, rituximab, or tocilizumab seem to maintain a good retention rate after the failure of a first-course therapy with a non-TNF inhibitor.
AB - OBJECTIVES: EULAR recommendations do not suggest which biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) should be preferred after failure of a first bDMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In particular, few data are available regarding the effectiveness of a second-line bDMARD after failure of abatacept (ABA), tocilizumab (TCZ), and rituximab (RTX). The aim of this study was to analyze the retention rate of a second line with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other mechanisms of action (MoAs), after the failure of either RTX, TCZ, or ABA. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-eight RA patients from the Italian GISEA registry were included in the study. RTX was the first bDMARD in 18% of patients, ABA in 45.7%, and TCZ in 36.3%, while the second bDMARD was a TNFi (group 1) in 129 patients and an agent with a different MoA (group 2) in 149. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 68), 129 patients discontinued their treatment; patients of group 1 discontinued the treatment more frequently than patients of group 2 (p<0.001) with retention rates of 33.6±5.7% and 63.6±4.6% after 104 weeks for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). At multivariate analysis, the mechanism of action was the only predictor for the maintenance in therapy. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, ABA, RTX, and TCZ seem to maintain a good retention rate also when used as a second-line therapy, suggesting their use after the failure of a non-TNFi as first-line therapy. However, specifically designed studies are needed to evaluate the more appropriate therapeutic strategies in RA, according to the first-line drug, including new targeted synthetic DMARDs. Key Points • A large proportion of rheumatoid arthritis patients fail the first biologic DMARD. • Few data are available about the efficacy of biologic DMARD after the failure of a non-TNF inhibitor. • Abatacept, rituximab, or tocilizumab seem to maintain a good retention rate after the failure of a first-course therapy with a non-TNF inhibitor.
KW - Abatacept
KW - Retention rate
KW - Rheumatoid arthritis
KW - Rituximab
KW - TNF inhibitors
KW - Tocilizumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117287840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85117287840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10067-021-05734-3
DO - 10.1007/s10067-021-05734-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 33881676
AN - SCOPUS:85117287840
SN - 0770-3198
VL - 40
SP - 4039
EP - 4047
JO - Clinical Rheumatology
JF - Clinical Rheumatology
IS - 10
ER -