TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of randomised phase II studies comparing S16020 with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer
AU - Pivot, X.
AU - Awada, A.
AU - Gedouin, D.
AU - Kerger, J.
AU - Rolland, F.
AU - Cupissol, D.
AU - Caponigro, F.
AU - Comella, G.
AU - Lopez-Pouza, J. J.
AU - Guardiola, E.
AU - Giroux, B.
AU - Gérard, B.
AU - Schneider, M.
PY - 2003/3/1
Y1 - 2003/3/1
N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to carry out two randomised phase II trials of S16020, a new olivacine derivative, tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, using methotrexate as the control arm to validate the results. Patients and methods: S16020 at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Methotrexate, 40 or 50 mg/m2, was given by bolus injection, weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks. In total, 36 patients were entered in the randomised studies (25 in an initial study, 11 in a confirmatory study) of whom 24 received S16020 and 12 received methotrexate. Results: A scheduled interim analysis showed one patient having a non-confirmed objective response with S16020 and three patients having a confirmed objective response with methotrexate. In the methotrexate group, there were no patients with severe non-haematological toxicity. With S16020, there was a high incidence of severe non-haematological toxicities, including asthenia, oedema of the face, oedema and pain at the tumour sites and erythematous rash; consequently, both studies were stopped. Conclusions: Both studies were stopped due to the poor anticipated benefit/risk ratio for S16020, although time to progression and overall survival time were similar in both treatment arms.
AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to carry out two randomised phase II trials of S16020, a new olivacine derivative, tested as a single agent in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer, using methotrexate as the control arm to validate the results. Patients and methods: S16020 at either 80 or 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 3-h infusion every 3 weeks. Methotrexate, 40 or 50 mg/m2, was given by bolus injection, weekly for a minimum of 6 weeks. In total, 36 patients were entered in the randomised studies (25 in an initial study, 11 in a confirmatory study) of whom 24 received S16020 and 12 received methotrexate. Results: A scheduled interim analysis showed one patient having a non-confirmed objective response with S16020 and three patients having a confirmed objective response with methotrexate. In the methotrexate group, there were no patients with severe non-haematological toxicity. With S16020, there was a high incidence of severe non-haematological toxicities, including asthenia, oedema of the face, oedema and pain at the tumour sites and erythematous rash; consequently, both studies were stopped. Conclusions: Both studies were stopped due to the poor anticipated benefit/risk ratio for S16020, although time to progression and overall survival time were similar in both treatment arms.
KW - Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
KW - Methotrexate
KW - Randomised trial
KW - Recurrence
KW - S16020
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037350218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037350218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/annonc/mdg114
DO - 10.1093/annonc/mdg114
M3 - Article
C2 - 12598340
AN - SCOPUS:0037350218
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 14
SP - 373
EP - 377
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 3
ER -