TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of a multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline in high-risk hematologic patients with cancer with febrile neutropenia
AU - Bucaneve, Giampaolo
AU - Micozzi, Alessandra
AU - Picardi, Marco
AU - Ballanti, Stelvio
AU - Cascavilla, Nicola
AU - Salutari, Prassede
AU - Specchia, Giorgina
AU - Fanci, Rosa
AU - Luppi, Mario
AU - Cudillo, Laura
AU - Cantaffa, Renato
AU - Milone, Giuseppe
AU - Bocchia, Monica
AU - Martinelli, Giovanni
AU - Offidani, Massimo
AU - Chierichini, Anna
AU - Fabbiano, Francesco
AU - Quarta, Giovanni
AU - Primon, Valeria
AU - Martino, Bruno
AU - Manna, Annunziata
AU - Zuffa, Eliana
AU - Ferrari, Antonella
AU - Gentile, Giuseppe
AU - Foà, Robin
AU - Del Favero, Albano
PY - 2014/5/10
Y1 - 2014/5/10
N2 - Purpose: Empiric antibiotic monotherapy is considered the standard of treatment for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer, but this approach may be inadequate because of the increasing prevalence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria. Patients and Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, superiority trial, adult, febrile, high-risk neutropenic patients (FhrNPs) with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to receive piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) with or without tigecycline (50 mg intravenously every 12 hours; loading dose 100 mg). The primary end point was resolution of febrile episode without modifications of the initial allocated treatment. Results: Three hundred ninety FhrNPs were enrolled (combination/monotherapy, 187/203) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITTA). The ITTA revealed a successful outcome in 67.9% v 44.3% of patients who had received combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (127/187 v 90/203; absolute difference in risk (adr), 23.6%; 95% CI, 14% to 33%; P <.001). The combination regimen proved better than monotherapy in bacteremias (adr, 32.8%; 95% CI, 19% to 46%; P <.001) and in clinically documented infections (adr, 36%; 95% CI, 9% to 64%; P <.01). Mortality and number of adverse effects were limited and similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline is safe, well tolerated, and more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam alone in febrile, high-risk, neutropenic hematologic patients with cancer. In epidemiologic settings characterized by a high prevalence of infections because of MDR microorganisms, this combination could be considered as one of the first-line empiric antibiotic therapies.
AB - Purpose: Empiric antibiotic monotherapy is considered the standard of treatment for febrile neutropenic patients with cancer, but this approach may be inadequate because of the increasing prevalence of infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria. Patients and Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, superiority trial, adult, febrile, high-risk neutropenic patients (FhrNPs) with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to receive piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) with or without tigecycline (50 mg intravenously every 12 hours; loading dose 100 mg). The primary end point was resolution of febrile episode without modifications of the initial allocated treatment. Results: Three hundred ninety FhrNPs were enrolled (combination/monotherapy, 187/203) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (ITTA). The ITTA revealed a successful outcome in 67.9% v 44.3% of patients who had received combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (127/187 v 90/203; absolute difference in risk (adr), 23.6%; 95% CI, 14% to 33%; P <.001). The combination regimen proved better than monotherapy in bacteremias (adr, 32.8%; 95% CI, 19% to 46%; P <.001) and in clinically documented infections (adr, 36%; 95% CI, 9% to 64%; P <.01). Mortality and number of adverse effects were limited and similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam and tigecycline is safe, well tolerated, and more effective than piperacillin/tazobactam alone in febrile, high-risk, neutropenic hematologic patients with cancer. In epidemiologic settings characterized by a high prevalence of infections because of MDR microorganisms, this combination could be considered as one of the first-line empiric antibiotic therapies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902953885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902953885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6963
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6963
M3 - Article
C2 - 24733807
AN - SCOPUS:84902953885
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 32
SP - 1463
EP - 1471
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 14
ER -