TY - JOUR
T1 - Regulatory T Cells and Their Prognostic Relevance in Hematologic Malignancies
AU - D'Arena, Giovanni
AU - Vitale, Candida
AU - Coscia, Marta
AU - Festa, Agostino
AU - Di Minno, Nicola Matteo Dario
AU - De Feo, Vincenzo
AU - Caraglia, Michele
AU - Calapai, Gioacchino
AU - Laurenti, Luca
AU - Musto, Pellegrino
AU - Di Minno, Giovanni
AU - Fenoglio, Daniela
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a fundamental function in monitoring the immune homeostasis in healthy individuals. In cancer and, in particular, in hematological malignancies, Tregs exert a major immunosuppressive activity, thus playing a critical role in tumor cell growth, proliferation, and survival. Here, we summarize published data on the prognostic significance of Tregs in hematological malignancies and show that they are highly conflicting. The heterogeneity of the experimental approaches that were used explains - at least in part - the discordant results reported by different groups that have investigated the role of Tregs in cancer. In fact, different tissues have been studied (i.e., peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node), applying different methods (i.e., flow cytometry versus immunohistochemistry, whole blood versus isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells versus depletion of CD25+ cells, various panels of monoclonal antibodies, techniques of fixation and permeabilization, and gating strategies). This is of relevance in order to stress the need to apply standardized approaches in the study of Tregs in hematological malignancies and in cancer in general.
AB - Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have a fundamental function in monitoring the immune homeostasis in healthy individuals. In cancer and, in particular, in hematological malignancies, Tregs exert a major immunosuppressive activity, thus playing a critical role in tumor cell growth, proliferation, and survival. Here, we summarize published data on the prognostic significance of Tregs in hematological malignancies and show that they are highly conflicting. The heterogeneity of the experimental approaches that were used explains - at least in part - the discordant results reported by different groups that have investigated the role of Tregs in cancer. In fact, different tissues have been studied (i.e., peripheral blood, bone marrow, and lymph node), applying different methods (i.e., flow cytometry versus immunohistochemistry, whole blood versus isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells versus depletion of CD25+ cells, various panels of monoclonal antibodies, techniques of fixation and permeabilization, and gating strategies). This is of relevance in order to stress the need to apply standardized approaches in the study of Tregs in hematological malignancies and in cancer in general.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042468053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042468053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2017/1832968
DO - 10.1155/2017/1832968
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85042468053
SN - 2314-8861
VL - 2017
JO - Journal of Immunology Research
JF - Journal of Immunology Research
M1 - 1832968
ER -