Regorafenib versus cabozantinb as second-line treatment after sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis

Andrea Casadei-Gardini, Lorenza Rimassa, Margherita Rimini, Changhoon Yoo, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Sara Lonardi, Gianluca Masi, Hyung-Don Kim, Caterina Vivaldi, Min-Hee Ryu, Mario Domenico Rizzato, Francesca Salani, Yeonghak Bang, Antonio Pellino, Silvia Catanese, Valentina Burgio, Stefano Cascinu, Alessandro Cucchetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, three published phase III trials highlighted the superiority of investigational drugs compared to placebo, thus leading to their approval in the second-line setting. We report here a MAIC of second-line MKI options for patients with HCC previously treated with sorafenib using individual real-world data of regorafenib and aggregate data of second-line cabozantinib from the CELESTIAL trial.

METHODS: Data from 278 patients who received regorafenib as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure for unresectable HCC were used as IPD. Data inclusion were adapted to those reported in the CELESTIAL trial in the subset of patients who received sorafenib as the only prior therapy. Survival medians and rates were obtained from Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences between regorafenib and cabozantinib groups were explored through Cox regression adjusted for weights originating from MAIC.

RESULTS: The median OS of the weighted regorafenib group was 11.1 months (IQR: 5.6-16.4) and 11.3 (IQR: 6.7-22.4) for cabozantinib; HR 0.83 (95%CI 0.62-1.09). The median PFS of the weighted regorafenib group was 3.0 months (IQR: 1.9-4.8) and 5.5 (IQR: 2.3-9.3) for cabozantinib; HR 0.50 (95%CI 0.41-0.62). In the subgroup who received prior sorafenib for < 3 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 6.5 months (IQR: 4.7-10.9) and 9.5 months (IQR: 5.9-18.2) for cabozantinib; HR 0.68 (95%CI 0.39-1.16). In the subgroup receiving prior sorafenib for 3 to < 6 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 8.0 months (IQR: 4.2-15.2) and 11.5 (IQR: 6.5-23.9) for cabozantinib; HR 0.66 (95%CI 0.42-1.02). In the subgroup receiving prior sorafenib for ≥ 6 months, the median OS of the regorafenib group was 13.4 (IQR: 8.1-46.5) and 12.3 (IQR: 6.6-22.9) for cabozantinib; HR 0.89 (95%CI 0.52-1.51).

CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed no differences between regorafenib and cabozantinib in terms of OS. However, in earlier progressors on prior sorafenib a larger benefit might be expected from cabozantinib treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3665-3671
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Volume147
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anilides/therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy
  • Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Pyridines/therapeutic use
  • Salvage Therapy/methods
  • Sorafenib/therapeutic use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regorafenib versus cabozantinb as second-line treatment after sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this