TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced Mortality With Partial-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer
T2 - A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
AU - Vaidya, Jayant S.
AU - Bulsara, Max
AU - Wenz, Frederik
AU - Coombs, Nathan
AU - Singer, Julian
AU - Ebbs, Stephen
AU - Massarut, Samuele
AU - Saunders, Christobel
AU - Douek, Michael
AU - Williams, Norman R.
AU - Joseph, David
AU - Tobias, Jeffrey S.
AU - Baum, Michael
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Purpose: With earlier detection and more effective treatment, mortality from breast cancer continues to fall and it has become increasingly important to reduce the toxicity of treatments. Partial-breast radiation therapy, which focuses radiation to the tumor bed, may achieve this aim. We analyzed mortality differences in randomized trials of partial-breast irradiation (PBI). Methods and Materials: We included data from published randomized trials of PBI (alone or as part of a risk-adapted approach) versus whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for invasive breast cancer suitable for breast-conserving therapy. We identified trials using PubMed and Google searches with the terms "partial breast irradiation" OR "intraoperative radiotherapy" OR "IMRT" OR ("accelerated" AND "radiation") AND "randomised/randomized," as well as through discussion with colleagues in the field. We calculated the proportion of patients who had events in each randomized arm at 5 years' follow-up and created a forest plot using Stata, version 14.1. Results: We identified 9 randomized trials of PBI versus WBI in invasive breast cancer; 5-year outcomes were available for non-breast cancer mortality in 5 trials (n=4489) and for breast cancer mortality in 4 trials (n=4231). The overall mortality was 4.9%. There was no detectable heterogeneity between the trials for any of the outcomes. There was no difference in the proportion of patients dying of breast cancer (difference, 0.000% [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.7 to +0.7]; . P=.999). Non-breast cancer mortality with PBI was lower than with WBI (difference, 1.1% [95% CI, -2.1% to -0.2%]; . P=.023). Total mortality with PBI was also lower than with WBI (difference, 1.3% [95% CI, -2.5% to 0.0%]; . P=.05). Conclusions: Use of PBI instead of WBI in selected patients results in a lower 5-year non-breast cancer and overall mortality, amounting to a 25% reduction in relative terms. This information should be included when breast-conserving therapy is proposed to a patient.
AB - Purpose: With earlier detection and more effective treatment, mortality from breast cancer continues to fall and it has become increasingly important to reduce the toxicity of treatments. Partial-breast radiation therapy, which focuses radiation to the tumor bed, may achieve this aim. We analyzed mortality differences in randomized trials of partial-breast irradiation (PBI). Methods and Materials: We included data from published randomized trials of PBI (alone or as part of a risk-adapted approach) versus whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for invasive breast cancer suitable for breast-conserving therapy. We identified trials using PubMed and Google searches with the terms "partial breast irradiation" OR "intraoperative radiotherapy" OR "IMRT" OR ("accelerated" AND "radiation") AND "randomised/randomized," as well as through discussion with colleagues in the field. We calculated the proportion of patients who had events in each randomized arm at 5 years' follow-up and created a forest plot using Stata, version 14.1. Results: We identified 9 randomized trials of PBI versus WBI in invasive breast cancer; 5-year outcomes were available for non-breast cancer mortality in 5 trials (n=4489) and for breast cancer mortality in 4 trials (n=4231). The overall mortality was 4.9%. There was no detectable heterogeneity between the trials for any of the outcomes. There was no difference in the proportion of patients dying of breast cancer (difference, 0.000% [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.7 to +0.7]; . P=.999). Non-breast cancer mortality with PBI was lower than with WBI (difference, 1.1% [95% CI, -2.1% to -0.2%]; . P=.023). Total mortality with PBI was also lower than with WBI (difference, 1.3% [95% CI, -2.5% to 0.0%]; . P=.05). Conclusions: Use of PBI instead of WBI in selected patients results in a lower 5-year non-breast cancer and overall mortality, amounting to a 25% reduction in relative terms. This information should be included when breast-conserving therapy is proposed to a patient.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979777871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979777871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84979777871
SN - 0360-3016
SP - 259
EP - 265
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
ER -