TY - JOUR
T1 - Recent advances in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
AU - Rocco, Bernardo
AU - Albo, Giancarlo
AU - Ferreira, Rafael Coelho
AU - Spinelli, Matteo
AU - Cozzi, Gabriele
AU - Dell'Orto, Paolo
AU - Patel, Vipul
AU - Rocco, Francesco
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - TURP for many years has been considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of BPH. Symptoms relief, improvement in Maximum flow rate and reduction of post void residual urine have been reported in several experiences. Notwithstanding a satisfactory efficacy, concerns have been reported in terms of safety outcomes:intracapsular perforation, TUR syndrome, bleeding with a higher risk of transfusion particularly in larger prostates have been extensivelyreported in the literature. In the recent years the use of new forms of energy and devices suchas bipolar resector, Ho: YAG and potassium-titanyl- phosphate laserare challenging the role of traditional TURP for BPH surgical treatment.In 1999 TURP represented the 81% of surgical treatment for BPHversus 39% of 2005. Is this a marketing driven change or is there areal advantage in new technologies?We analyzed guidelines and higher evidence studies to evaluate therole of the most relevant new surgical approaches compared to TURPfor the treatment of BPH.In case of prostates of very large size the challenge is ongoing, withminimally invasive laparoscopic approach and most recently roboticapproach. We will evaluate the most recent literature on thisemerging field.
AB - TURP for many years has been considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of BPH. Symptoms relief, improvement in Maximum flow rate and reduction of post void residual urine have been reported in several experiences. Notwithstanding a satisfactory efficacy, concerns have been reported in terms of safety outcomes:intracapsular perforation, TUR syndrome, bleeding with a higher risk of transfusion particularly in larger prostates have been extensivelyreported in the literature. In the recent years the use of new forms of energy and devices suchas bipolar resector, Ho: YAG and potassium-titanyl- phosphate laserare challenging the role of traditional TURP for BPH surgical treatment.In 1999 TURP represented the 81% of surgical treatment for BPHversus 39% of 2005. Is this a marketing driven change or is there areal advantage in new technologies?We analyzed guidelines and higher evidence studies to evaluate therole of the most relevant new surgical approaches compared to TURPfor the treatment of BPH.In case of prostates of very large size the challenge is ongoing, withminimally invasive laparoscopic approach and most recently roboticapproach. We will evaluate the most recent literature on thisemerging field.
KW - Benign prostatic hyperplasia
KW - Holep
KW - Laser
KW - RASP
KW - surgery
KW - treatment
KW - TURP
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955164006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82955164006&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1756287211426301
DO - 10.1177/1756287211426301
M3 - Article
C2 - 22164196
AN - SCOPUS:82955164006
SN - 1756-2872
VL - 3
SP - 263
EP - 272
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Urology
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Urology
IS - 6
ER -