TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients
T2 - The MaxCmin1 trial
AU - Dragsted, Ulrik Bak
AU - Gerstoft, Jan
AU - Pedersen, Court
AU - Peters, Barry
AU - Duran, Adriana
AU - Obel, Niels
AU - Castagna, Antonella
AU - Cahn, Pedro
AU - Clumeck, Nathan
AU - Bruun, Johan N.
AU - Benetucci, Jorge
AU - Hill, Andrew
AU - Cassetti, Isabel
AU - Vernazza, Pietro
AU - Youle, Mike
AU - Fox, Zoe
AU - Lundgren, Jens D.
PY - 2003/9/1
Y1 - 2003/9/1
N2 - This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P = .76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P = .009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P = .013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied.
AB - This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P = .76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P = .009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P = .013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141612910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141612910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/377288
DO - 10.1086/377288
M3 - Article
C2 - 12934178
AN - SCOPUS:0141612910
SN - 0022-1899
VL - 188
SP - 635
EP - 642
JO - Journal of Infectious Diseases
JF - Journal of Infectious Diseases
IS - 5
ER -