Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Tomasz M Beer, Eugene D Kwon, Charles G Drake, Karim Fizazi, Christopher Logothetis, Gwenaelle Gravis, Vinod Ganju, Jonathan Polikoff, Fred Saad, Piotr Humanski, Josep M Piulats, Pablo Gonzalez Mella, Siobhan S Ng, Dirk Jaeger, Francis X Parnis, Fabio A Franke, Javier Puente, Roman Carvajal, Lisa Sengeløv, M Brent McHenryArvind Varma, Alfonsus J van den Eertwegh, Winald Gerritsen, Laura Ridolfi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-47
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Asymptomatic Diseases
  • Bone Neoplasms
  • Diarrhea
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Ipilimumab
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
  • Survival Rate
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Journal Article
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this