TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer
T2 - Is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy?
AU - Rizzo, Sergio
AU - Bronte, Giuseppe
AU - Fanale, Daniele
AU - Corsini, Lidia
AU - Silvestris, Nicola
AU - Santini, Daniele
AU - Gulotta, Gaspare
AU - Bazan, Viviana
AU - Gebbia, Nicola
AU - Fulfaro, Fabio
AU - Russo, Antonio
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - An important molecular target for metastatic CRC treatment is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many potential biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) have been retrospectively evaluated, including EGFR activation markers and EGFR ligands activation markers. With regard to the 'negative predictive factors'responsible for primary or intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies a lot of data are now available. Among these, KRAS mutations have emerged as a major predictor of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab in the clinical setting and several studies of patients receiving first and subsequent lines of treatment have shown that those with tumors carrying KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies or show any survival benefit from such treatments. The role of B-RAF mutations, mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations, in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs is not yet consolidated. It therefore appears that BRAF mutations may play a strong negative prognostic role and only a slight role in resistance to anti-EGFR Abs.
AB - An important molecular target for metastatic CRC treatment is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many potential biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab) have been retrospectively evaluated, including EGFR activation markers and EGFR ligands activation markers. With regard to the 'negative predictive factors'responsible for primary or intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies a lot of data are now available. Among these, KRAS mutations have emerged as a major predictor of resistance to panitumumab or cetuximab in the clinical setting and several studies of patients receiving first and subsequent lines of treatment have shown that those with tumors carrying KRAS mutations do not respond to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies or show any survival benefit from such treatments. The role of B-RAF mutations, mutually exclusive with KRAS mutations, in predicting resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs is not yet consolidated. It therefore appears that BRAF mutations may play a strong negative prognostic role and only a slight role in resistance to anti-EGFR Abs.
KW - Driver mutations
KW - EGFR
KW - KRAS
KW - Monoclonal antibodies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649744892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649744892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0305-7372(10)70021-9
DO - 10.1016/S0305-7372(10)70021-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 21129611
AN - SCOPUS:78649744892
SN - 0305-7372
VL - 36
JO - Cancer Treatment Reviews
JF - Cancer Treatment Reviews
IS - SUPPL. 3
ER -