TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Model for Resected Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: External Multicenter Validation and Propensity Score Analysis exploring the Impact of Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment
AU - Pilotto, S.
AU - Sperduti, I.
AU - Leuzzi, G.
AU - Chiappetta, M.
AU - Mucilli, F.
AU - Ratto, G. B.
AU - Lococo, F.
AU - Filosso, P. L.
AU - Spaggiari, L.
AU - Novello, S.
AU - Milella, M.
AU - Santo, A.
AU - Scarpa, A.
AU - Infante, M.
AU - Tortora, G.
AU - Facciolo, F.
AU - Bria, E.
N1 - LR: 20180203; CI: Copyright (c) 2017; JID: 101274235; OTO: NOTNLM; 2017/08/23 00:00 [received]; 2017/12/02 00:00 [revised]; 2017/12/09 00:00 [accepted]; 2017/12/23 06:00 [pubmed]; 2017/12/23 06:00 [medline]; 2017/12/23 06:00 [entrez]; aheadofprint
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - INTRODUCTION: We developed one of the first clinicopathological prognostic nomograms for resected squamous cell lung cancer (SQLC). Herein, we validate the model in a larger multicenter cohort and we explore the impact of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment (ANT). METHODS: Patients with resected SQLC from January 2002 to December 2012 in six institutions were eligible. Each patient was assigned a prognostic score based on the clinicopathological factors included in the model (age, T descriptor according to seventh edition of the TNM classification, lymph node status, and grading). Kaplan-Meier analysis for disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival was performed according to a three-class risk model. Harrell's C-statistics were adopted for model validation. The effect of ANT was adjusted with propensity score. RESULTS: Data on 1375 patients were gathered (median age, 68 years; male sex, 86.8%; T descriptor 1 or 2 versus 3 or 4, 71.7% versus 24.9%; nodes negative versus positive, 53.4% versus 46.6%; and grading of 1 or 2 versus 3, 35.0% versus 41.1%). Data for survival analysis were available for 1097 patients. With a median follow-up of 55 months, patients at low risk had a significantly longer disease-free survival than did patients at intermediate risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-2.01) and patients at high risk (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.90-3.19); they also had a significantly longer CSS (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.80-3.36 versus HR = 4.30, 95% CI: 2.92-6.33) and overall survival (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.48-2.17 versus HR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.76-3.07). A trend in favor of ANT was observed for intermediate-risk/high-risk patients, particularly for CSS (p = 0.06 [5-year CSS 72.7% versus 60.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: A model based on a combination of easily available clinicopathological factors effectively stratifies patients with resected SQLC into three risk classes.
AB - INTRODUCTION: We developed one of the first clinicopathological prognostic nomograms for resected squamous cell lung cancer (SQLC). Herein, we validate the model in a larger multicenter cohort and we explore the impact of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment (ANT). METHODS: Patients with resected SQLC from January 2002 to December 2012 in six institutions were eligible. Each patient was assigned a prognostic score based on the clinicopathological factors included in the model (age, T descriptor according to seventh edition of the TNM classification, lymph node status, and grading). Kaplan-Meier analysis for disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival was performed according to a three-class risk model. Harrell's C-statistics were adopted for model validation. The effect of ANT was adjusted with propensity score. RESULTS: Data on 1375 patients were gathered (median age, 68 years; male sex, 86.8%; T descriptor 1 or 2 versus 3 or 4, 71.7% versus 24.9%; nodes negative versus positive, 53.4% versus 46.6%; and grading of 1 or 2 versus 3, 35.0% versus 41.1%). Data for survival analysis were available for 1097 patients. With a median follow-up of 55 months, patients at low risk had a significantly longer disease-free survival than did patients at intermediate risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-2.01) and patients at high risk (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.90-3.19); they also had a significantly longer CSS (HR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.80-3.36 versus HR = 4.30, 95% CI: 2.92-6.33) and overall survival (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.48-2.17 versus HR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.76-3.07). A trend in favor of ANT was observed for intermediate-risk/high-risk patients, particularly for CSS (p = 0.06 [5-year CSS 72.7% versus 60.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: A model based on a combination of easily available clinicopathological factors effectively stratifies patients with resected SQLC into three risk classes.
KW - Adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment
KW - Clinicopathological factors
KW - Nomogram
KW - Prognosis
KW - Squamous lung cancer
U2 - S1556-0864(17)33101-5 [pii]
DO - S1556-0864(17)33101-5 [pii]
M3 - Article
SN - 1556-0864
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
ER -