TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting Late Fecal Incontinence Risk After Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
T2 - New Insights From External Independent Validation
AU - Cicchetti, Alessandro
AU - Avuzzi, Barbara
AU - Palorini, Federica
AU - Ballarini, Francesca
AU - Stucchi, Claudio
AU - Fellin, Giovanni
AU - Gabriele, Pietro
AU - Vavassori, Vittorio
AU - Esposti, Claudio Degli
AU - Cozzarini, Cesare
AU - Fiorino, Claudio
AU - Rancati, Tiziana
AU - Valdagni, Riccardo
N1 - Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate a previously published predictive model for late fecal incontinence (FI) in a contemporary population of prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiation therapy.METHODS AND MATERIALS: The validation included patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (2010-2014). Prescribed dose range was 65-80 Gy, including conventional and moderate hypo-fractionated treatments. Rectal toxicity was scored using LENT/SOMA, a minimum 2-year follow up was considered. We chose to validate the model published by Rancati et al for predicting chronic FI, developed on a 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) population. It considered a longitudinal endpoint defined as the average toxicity grade during the follow up. This continuous endpoint was dichotomized using a cut-off value of mean FI grade >1. The model included mean rectal dose (Dmean), previous diseases of the colon (COLO) and previous abdominal surgery (SURG). Doses were corrected to 2 Gy/fraction using the linear-quadratic model and applying alpha/beta ratio = 4.8 Gy.RESULTS: 228 patients constituted the validation population. A mean FI grade >1 was scored in 25 patients (11%). Logistic regression confirmed risk factors reported in the literature, with similar odds ratios (ORs) for Dmean (1.04 ± 0.03 vs 1.06 ± 0.04) and SURG (1.9 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.45); COLO was not confirmed. Consequently, the predictive models including Dmean/Dmean + SURG were evaluated using calibration plots. Both showed a clear discriminative trend, but the absolute observed toxicity rates were underestimated (ie, absolute predicted rates were always lower than corresponding absolute observed rates). This result was consistent with an unexpected effect of hypofractionation (OR = 2.20, conventional = 8.1% vs hypofractionated = 17.4%) beyond the standard correction using linear-quadratic model. Nevertheless, the FI rate in the conventionally treated group was almost double the rate observed in the previously studied cohort (4.3% vs 8.1%).CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms previously published results indicating that abdominal surgery and rectal mean dose are risk factors for late FI. Calibration plots highlight a possible role of hypofractionation beyond linear-quadratic correction.
AB - PURPOSE: This study aimed to validate a previously published predictive model for late fecal incontinence (FI) in a contemporary population of prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiation therapy.METHODS AND MATERIALS: The validation included patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (2010-2014). Prescribed dose range was 65-80 Gy, including conventional and moderate hypo-fractionated treatments. Rectal toxicity was scored using LENT/SOMA, a minimum 2-year follow up was considered. We chose to validate the model published by Rancati et al for predicting chronic FI, developed on a 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) population. It considered a longitudinal endpoint defined as the average toxicity grade during the follow up. This continuous endpoint was dichotomized using a cut-off value of mean FI grade >1. The model included mean rectal dose (Dmean), previous diseases of the colon (COLO) and previous abdominal surgery (SURG). Doses were corrected to 2 Gy/fraction using the linear-quadratic model and applying alpha/beta ratio = 4.8 Gy.RESULTS: 228 patients constituted the validation population. A mean FI grade >1 was scored in 25 patients (11%). Logistic regression confirmed risk factors reported in the literature, with similar odds ratios (ORs) for Dmean (1.04 ± 0.03 vs 1.06 ± 0.04) and SURG (1.9 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.45); COLO was not confirmed. Consequently, the predictive models including Dmean/Dmean + SURG were evaluated using calibration plots. Both showed a clear discriminative trend, but the absolute observed toxicity rates were underestimated (ie, absolute predicted rates were always lower than corresponding absolute observed rates). This result was consistent with an unexpected effect of hypofractionation (OR = 2.20, conventional = 8.1% vs hypofractionated = 17.4%) beyond the standard correction using linear-quadratic model. Nevertheless, the FI rate in the conventionally treated group was almost double the rate observed in the previously studied cohort (4.3% vs 8.1%).CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms previously published results indicating that abdominal surgery and rectal mean dose are risk factors for late FI. Calibration plots highlight a possible role of hypofractionation beyond linear-quadratic correction.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 29970313
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 102
SP - 127
EP - 136
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 1
ER -