TY - JOUR
T1 - Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of Nephrectomy and Caval Thrombectomy Using Extracorporeal Circulation and Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest for Renal Cell Carcinoma Invading the Supradiaphragmatic Inferior Vena Cava and/or Right Atrium
AU - Nini, A
AU - Capitanio, U
AU - Larcher, A
AU - Dell'Oglio, P
AU - Dehò, F
AU - Suardi, N
AU - Muttin, F
AU - Carenzi, C
AU - Freschi, M
AU - Lucianò, R
AU - La Croce, Giovanni
AU - Briganti, A
AU - Colombo, R
AU - Salonia, A
AU - Castiglioni, A
AU - Rigatti, P
AU - Montorsi, F
AU - Bertini, R
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Radical nephrectomy (RN) and caval thrombectomy (CT) for renal cell carcinoma, with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is a challenging surgical approach. Objective: To assess peri-operative and oncologic outcomes of renal cell carcinoma patients treated with RN and CT, using ECC and DHCA. Design, setting, and participants: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients who underwent RN and CT using ECC and DHCA. Surgical procedure: After retroperitoneal nodal dissection and RN, a cardiopulmonary bypass was placed and DHCA achieved. A combined approach through the abdomen and the thorax was described. Measurements: Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were reported. Results and limitations: Median operative time and length of hospital stay were 545. min and 22 d. Overall, 33 patients (72%) did not require any additional interventional or surgical treatment. Thirty-day and 90-d mortality were 11% (5/46) and 15% (7/46). The 1-yr, 2-yr, and 3-yr cancer specific mortality (CSM)-free survival rates were 77%, 62%, and 56%, respectively. After stratification, according to metastatic status at diagnosis, CSM-free survival rates were significantly lower for cM1 patients compared with cM0 patients (1-yr 46% vs 93%, 2-yr 23% vs 81%, 3-yr 23% vs 73%, p <. 0.01). Our study is limited by its retrospective and uncomparative nature. Conclusions: RN with CT using ECC and DHCA is a challenging procedure which requires a dedicated multidisciplinary working team to minimise complications and maximise patients' outcomes. Patient summary: Patients with kidney cancer and a thrombus within the inferior vena cava, which reaches above the diaphragm, can be treated w ith surgery. However, this kind of surgical treatment is challenging and requires a dedicated multidisciplinary team in order to accomplish the task. Radical nephrectomy and caval thrombectomy using extracorporeal circulation and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is a challenging procedure, which requires a dedicated multidisciplinary working team. We provide evidence that cM0 patients have non-negligible midterm survival. Conversely, in cM1 patients, survival remains invariably poor. © 2017 European Association of Urology.
AB - Background: Radical nephrectomy (RN) and caval thrombectomy (CT) for renal cell carcinoma, with extracorporeal circulation (ECC) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is a challenging surgical approach. Objective: To assess peri-operative and oncologic outcomes of renal cell carcinoma patients treated with RN and CT, using ECC and DHCA. Design, setting, and participants: We retrospectively evaluated 46 patients who underwent RN and CT using ECC and DHCA. Surgical procedure: After retroperitoneal nodal dissection and RN, a cardiopulmonary bypass was placed and DHCA achieved. A combined approach through the abdomen and the thorax was described. Measurements: Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes were reported. Results and limitations: Median operative time and length of hospital stay were 545. min and 22 d. Overall, 33 patients (72%) did not require any additional interventional or surgical treatment. Thirty-day and 90-d mortality were 11% (5/46) and 15% (7/46). The 1-yr, 2-yr, and 3-yr cancer specific mortality (CSM)-free survival rates were 77%, 62%, and 56%, respectively. After stratification, according to metastatic status at diagnosis, CSM-free survival rates were significantly lower for cM1 patients compared with cM0 patients (1-yr 46% vs 93%, 2-yr 23% vs 81%, 3-yr 23% vs 73%, p <. 0.01). Our study is limited by its retrospective and uncomparative nature. Conclusions: RN with CT using ECC and DHCA is a challenging procedure which requires a dedicated multidisciplinary working team to minimise complications and maximise patients' outcomes. Patient summary: Patients with kidney cancer and a thrombus within the inferior vena cava, which reaches above the diaphragm, can be treated w ith surgery. However, this kind of surgical treatment is challenging and requires a dedicated multidisciplinary team in order to accomplish the task. Radical nephrectomy and caval thrombectomy using extracorporeal circulation and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is a challenging procedure, which requires a dedicated multidisciplinary working team. We provide evidence that cM0 patients have non-negligible midterm survival. Conversely, in cM1 patients, survival remains invariably poor. © 2017 European Association of Urology.
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.019
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.019
M3 - Article
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 73
SP - 793
EP - 799
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 5
ER -