TY - JOUR
T1 - PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors during late stages of life: an ad-hoc analysis from a large multicenter cohort
AU - Santini, Daniele
AU - Zeppola, Tea
AU - Russano, Marco
AU - Citarella, Fabrizio
AU - Anesi, Cecilia
AU - Buti, Sebastiano
AU - Tucci, Marco
AU - Russo, Alessandro
AU - Sergi, Maria Chiara
AU - Adamo, Vincenzo
AU - Stucci, Luigia S.
AU - Bersanelli, Melissa
AU - Mazzaschi, Giulia
AU - Spagnolo, Francesco
AU - Rastelli, Francesca
AU - Giorgi, Francesca Chiara
AU - Giusti, Raffaele
AU - Filetti, Marco
AU - Marchetti, Paolo
AU - Botticelli, Andrea
AU - Gelibter, Alain
AU - Siringo, Marco
AU - Ferrari, Marco
AU - Marconcini, Riccardo
AU - Vitale, Maria Giuseppa
AU - Nicolardi, Linda
AU - Chiari, Rita
AU - Ghidini, Michele
AU - Nigro, Olga
AU - Grossi, Francesco
AU - De Tursi, Michele
AU - Di Marino, Pietro
AU - Pala, Laura
AU - Queirolo, Paola
AU - Bracarda, Sergio
AU - Macrini, Serena
AU - Gori, Stefania
AU - Inno, Alessandro
AU - Zoratto, Federica
AU - Tanda, Enrica T.
AU - Mallardo, Domenico
AU - Vitale, Maria Grazia
AU - Talbot, Thomas
AU - Ascierto, Paolo A.
AU - Pinato, David J.
AU - Ficorella, Corrado
AU - Porzio, Giampiero
AU - Cortellini, Alessio
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Sebastiano Buti received honoraria as speaker at scientific events and advisory role by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer; MSD, Ipsen, Roche, Eli-Lilly, AstraZeneca and Novartis. Dr. Melissa Bersanelli received research funding by Roche, Seqirus, Pfizer and Novartis, personal fees as speaker/consultant by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS. Dr Raffaele Giusti received speaker fees and grant consultancies from AstraZeneca and Roche. Dr Maria G Vitale received speaker fees, grant consultancies and travel support from BMS, Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas, Jansen and Pierre-Fabre. Dr Alessandro Russo received grant consultancies from AstraZeneca and MSD. Dr Francesco Spagnolo received speaker fees and grant consultancies from Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pierre-Fabre, Sanofi, Merck and Sunpharma. Paolo A. Ascierto has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Array, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, Incyte, Medimmune, AstraZeneca, Syndax, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Ultimovacs, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Alkermes, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Oncosec, Nouscom, Takis, Lunaphore, Seagen. He also received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Array, Sanofi and travel support from MSD. Dr David J. Pinato received lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare, Bayer Healthcare and travel expenses from BMS and Bayer Healthcare; consulting fees for Mina Therapeutics, EISAI, Roche, Astra Zeneca; received research funding (to institution) from MSD, BMS. Dr Alessio Cortellini received speaker fees and grant consultancies from Roche, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Astellas. All other authors declared no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: The favourable safety profile and the increasing confidence with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might have boosted their prescription in frail patients with short life expectancies, who usually are not treated with standard chemotherapy. Methods: The present analysis aims to describe clinicians’ attitudes towards ICIs administration during late stages of life within a multicenter cohort of advanced cancer patients treated with single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in Italy. Results: Overall, 1149 patients with advanced cancer who received single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors were screened. The final study population consisted of 567 deceased patients. 166 patients (29.3%) had received ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (28.3% vs 11.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (69.3% vs 59.4%, p = 0.0266). In total, 35 patients (6.2%) started ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (45.7% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (82.9% vs 60.9%, p = 0.0266). Primary tumors were significantly different across subgroups (p = 0.0172), with a higher prevalence of NSCLC patients (80% vs 60.9%) among those who started ICIs within 30 days of death. Lastly, 123 patients (21.7%) started ICIs within 3 months of death. Similarly, within this subgroup there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (29.3% vs 12.8%, p < 0.0001), with a higher burden of disease (74.0% vs 59.0%, p = 0.0025) and with NSCLC (74.0% vs 58.8%, p = 0.0236). Conclusion: Our results confirmed a trend toward an increasing ICIs prescription in frail patients, during the late stages of life. Caution should be exercised when evaluating an ICI treatment for patients with a poor PS and a high burden of disease.
AB - Background: The favourable safety profile and the increasing confidence with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might have boosted their prescription in frail patients with short life expectancies, who usually are not treated with standard chemotherapy. Methods: The present analysis aims to describe clinicians’ attitudes towards ICIs administration during late stages of life within a multicenter cohort of advanced cancer patients treated with single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in Italy. Results: Overall, 1149 patients with advanced cancer who received single agent PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors were screened. The final study population consisted of 567 deceased patients. 166 patients (29.3%) had received ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (28.3% vs 11.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (69.3% vs 59.4%, p = 0.0266). In total, 35 patients (6.2%) started ICIs within 30 days of death; among them there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (45.7% vs 14.5%, p < 0.0001) and with a higher burden of disease (82.9% vs 60.9%, p = 0.0266). Primary tumors were significantly different across subgroups (p = 0.0172), with a higher prevalence of NSCLC patients (80% vs 60.9%) among those who started ICIs within 30 days of death. Lastly, 123 patients (21.7%) started ICIs within 3 months of death. Similarly, within this subgroup there was a higher proportion of patients with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 (29.3% vs 12.8%, p < 0.0001), with a higher burden of disease (74.0% vs 59.0%, p = 0.0025) and with NSCLC (74.0% vs 58.8%, p = 0.0236). Conclusion: Our results confirmed a trend toward an increasing ICIs prescription in frail patients, during the late stages of life. Caution should be exercised when evaluating an ICI treatment for patients with a poor PS and a high burden of disease.
KW - Appropriateness
KW - End-of-life
KW - Immune checkpoint inhibitors
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Palliative care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108801648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108801648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12967-021-02937-9
DO - 10.1186/s12967-021-02937-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85108801648
SN - 1479-5876
VL - 19
SP - 270
JO - Journal of Translational Medicine
JF - Journal of Translational Medicine
IS - 1
ER -