TY - JOUR
T1 - Pattern Recognition Approaches for Breast Cancer DCE-MRI Classification
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Fusco, Roberta
AU - Sansone, Mario
AU - Filice, Salvatore
AU - Carone, Guglielmo
AU - Amato, Daniela Maria
AU - Sansone, Carlo
AU - Petrillo, Antonella
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), tree-based classifiers (TC), and Bayesian classifiers (BC), and features used for classification are described. The findings of a systematic review of 26 studies are presented. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 91 and 83 % for ANN, 85 and 82 % for SVM, 96 and 85 % for LDA, 92 and 87 % for TC, and 82 and 85 % for BC. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 82 and 74 % for dynamic features, 93 and 60 % for morphological features, 88 and 81 % for textural features, 95 and 86 % for a combination of dynamic and morphological features, and 88 and 84 % for a combination of dynamic, morphological, and other features. LDA and TC have the best performance. A combination of dynamic and morphological features gives the best performance.
AB - We performed a systematic review of several pattern analysis approaches for classifying breast lesions using dynamic, morphological, and textural features in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Several machine learning approaches, namely artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), tree-based classifiers (TC), and Bayesian classifiers (BC), and features used for classification are described. The findings of a systematic review of 26 studies are presented. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 91 and 83 % for ANN, 85 and 82 % for SVM, 96 and 85 % for LDA, 92 and 87 % for TC, and 82 and 85 % for BC. The sensitivity and specificity are respectively 82 and 74 % for dynamic features, 93 and 60 % for morphological features, 88 and 81 % for textural features, 95 and 86 % for a combination of dynamic and morphological features, and 88 and 84 % for a combination of dynamic, morphological, and other features. LDA and TC have the best performance. A combination of dynamic and morphological features gives the best performance.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Classification
KW - Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)
KW - Patter recognition approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986919800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986919800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7
DO - 10.1007/s40846-016-0163-7
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84986919800
SN - 1609-0985
VL - 36
SP - 449
EP - 459
JO - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
JF - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
IS - 4
ER -