Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study

C. Corbellini; R. Biffi; F. Luca; A. Chiappa; S. Costa; E. Bertani; S. Bona; D. Lombardi; D. Tamayo; E. Botteri; B. Andreoni

doi:10.5301/tj.5000533

Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study

C. Corbellini, R. Biffi, F. Luca, A. Chiappa, S. Costa, E. Bertani, S. Bona, D. Lombardi, D. Tamayo, E. Botteri, B. Andreoni

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Several studies have demonstrated the oncologic equivalence of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) rectal cancer surgeries and have shown how challenging LS may become. Robotic surgery (RS) has emerged as a practical alternative, offering interesting advantages in comparison to both LS and OS. The aim of this study is to resolve the clinicopathologic outcome advantages of RS with respect to OS and LS techniques. Methods: Patients with rectal cancer undergoing OS, RS, or LS were evaluated within the period from April 2009 to August 2011. The evaluations were carried out in 4 Italian hospitals. Perioperative clinicopathologic data, postoperative complications, and 3-year overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed. Results: A total of 160 patients (94 male, 66 female) were included. A total of 105 patients underwent miniinvasive procedure (40 LS; 65 RS), whereas OS was performed in 55 patients. Anterior resection of rectal cancer was the most performed surgical procedure (139; 87%). Median operation time was significantly longer in the RS group (p

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	414-421
Number of pages	8
Journal	Tumori
Volume	102
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000533
Publication status	Published - 2016

Access to Document

10.5301/tj.5000533

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84984677500&doi=10.5301%2ftj.5000533&partnerID=40&md5=eb2ccf7be3c2aa318f70be28d0d45c57

Cite this

@article{a0bf3d2cc69743adbdb93edeb8fe242e,

title = "Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study",

abstract = "Purpose: Several studies have demonstrated the oncologic equivalence of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) rectal cancer surgeries and have shown how challenging LS may become. Robotic surgery (RS) has emerged as a practical alternative, offering interesting advantages in comparison to both LS and OS. The aim of this study is to resolve the clinicopathologic outcome advantages of RS with respect to OS and LS techniques. Methods: Patients with rectal cancer undergoing OS, RS, or LS were evaluated within the period from April 2009 to August 2011. The evaluations were carried out in 4 Italian hospitals. Perioperative clinicopathologic data, postoperative complications, and 3-year overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed. Results: A total of 160 patients (94 male, 66 female) were included. A total of 105 patients underwent miniinvasive procedure (40 LS; 65 RS), whereas OS was performed in 55 patients. Anterior resection of rectal cancer was the most performed surgical procedure (139; 87%). Median operation time was significantly longer in the RS group (p",

keywords = "Laparoscopic surgery, Medium-term outcome, Open surgery, Rectal cancer, Rectal cancer resection, Robotic surgery",

author = "C. Corbellini and R. Biffi and F. Luca and A. Chiappa and S. Costa and E. Bertani and S. Bona and D. Lombardi and D. Tamayo and E. Botteri and B. Andreoni",

note = "Export Date: 28 March 2017",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.5301/tj.5000533",

language = "English",

volume = "102",

pages = "414--421",

journal = "Tumori",

issn = "0300-8916",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Medium-term comparative outcomes from a multicenter study

AU - Corbellini, C.

AU - Biffi, R.

AU - Luca, F.

AU - Chiappa, A.

AU - Costa, S.

AU - Bertani, E.

AU - Bona, S.

AU - Lombardi, D.

AU - Tamayo, D.

AU - Botteri, E.

AU - Andreoni, B.

N1 - Export Date: 28 March 2017

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: Several studies have demonstrated the oncologic equivalence of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) rectal cancer surgeries and have shown how challenging LS may become. Robotic surgery (RS) has emerged as a practical alternative, offering interesting advantages in comparison to both LS and OS. The aim of this study is to resolve the clinicopathologic outcome advantages of RS with respect to OS and LS techniques. Methods: Patients with rectal cancer undergoing OS, RS, or LS were evaluated within the period from April 2009 to August 2011. The evaluations were carried out in 4 Italian hospitals. Perioperative clinicopathologic data, postoperative complications, and 3-year overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed. Results: A total of 160 patients (94 male, 66 female) were included. A total of 105 patients underwent miniinvasive procedure (40 LS; 65 RS), whereas OS was performed in 55 patients. Anterior resection of rectal cancer was the most performed surgical procedure (139; 87%). Median operation time was significantly longer in the RS group (p

AB - Purpose: Several studies have demonstrated the oncologic equivalence of laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) rectal cancer surgeries and have shown how challenging LS may become. Robotic surgery (RS) has emerged as a practical alternative, offering interesting advantages in comparison to both LS and OS. The aim of this study is to resolve the clinicopathologic outcome advantages of RS with respect to OS and LS techniques. Methods: Patients with rectal cancer undergoing OS, RS, or LS were evaluated within the period from April 2009 to August 2011. The evaluations were carried out in 4 Italian hospitals. Perioperative clinicopathologic data, postoperative complications, and 3-year overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed. Results: A total of 160 patients (94 male, 66 female) were included. A total of 105 patients underwent miniinvasive procedure (40 LS; 65 RS), whereas OS was performed in 55 patients. Anterior resection of rectal cancer was the most performed surgical procedure (139; 87%). Median operation time was significantly longer in the RS group (p

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Medium-term outcome

KW - Open surgery

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Rectal cancer resection

KW - Robotic surgery

U2 - 10.5301/tj.5000533

DO - 10.5301/tj.5000533

M3 - Article

SN - 0300-8916

VL - 102

SP - 414

EP - 421

JO - Tumori

JF - Tumori

IS - 4

ER -