TY - JOUR
T1 - Rilevazione retrospettiva multicentrica degli usi on-label e off-label dei farmaci chemioterapici utilizzati nei regimi di condizionamento nel trapianto di midollo osseo
AU - Orsi, Cecilia
AU - Cecchi, Michele
AU - Messori, Andrea
AU - Caccese, Erminia
AU - Trippoli, Sabrina
AU - Oldani, Elena
AU - Bosi, Alberto
AU - Guidi, Stefano
AU - Bartolozzi, Benedetta
AU - Bacigalupo, Andrea
AU - Vanliant, Maria Teresa
AU - Lamparelli, Teresa
AU - Alessandrino, Emilio Paolo
AU - Patriarca, Francesca
AU - Raimondi, Roberto
AU - Borghero, Carlo
PY - 2007/10
Y1 - 2007/10
N2 - Background. In Italy the use of anticancer drugs outside approved indications (off-label) is frequent. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate off-label and on-label uses in the conditioning regimens for patients receiving autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT). Patients and methods. Six Italian hospitals participated in the study. We retrospectively examined all patients who received SCT in these centres over the period from June to September 2006. Results. A total of 133 patients were studied; 75.9% of the schedules used were off-label (N=101) and 24.1/% were on-label (N=32). The three most frequent therapeutic regimens were: melphalan (labelled for conditioniong regimens in patients with multiple mieloma), BEAM (off-label) and BUCY (off-label). Conclusion. Our results show that the majority of current conditioning regimens are off-label. However, this use is well-established and homogeneous across the 6 centres. Our study was completed in February 2007 and emphasized the need for a better regulation on this topic. This then happened with the AIFA Determination of 29 May 2007 that presented a revised list of on-label and off-label uses of anti-cancer drugs reimbursed by National Health System and implicitly approved the off-label uses contained in the list.
AB - Background. In Italy the use of anticancer drugs outside approved indications (off-label) is frequent. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate off-label and on-label uses in the conditioning regimens for patients receiving autologous or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT). Patients and methods. Six Italian hospitals participated in the study. We retrospectively examined all patients who received SCT in these centres over the period from June to September 2006. Results. A total of 133 patients were studied; 75.9% of the schedules used were off-label (N=101) and 24.1/% were on-label (N=32). The three most frequent therapeutic regimens were: melphalan (labelled for conditioniong regimens in patients with multiple mieloma), BEAM (off-label) and BUCY (off-label). Conclusion. Our results show that the majority of current conditioning regimens are off-label. However, this use is well-established and homogeneous across the 6 centres. Our study was completed in February 2007 and emphasized the need for a better regulation on this topic. This then happened with the AIFA Determination of 29 May 2007 that presented a revised list of on-label and off-label uses of anti-cancer drugs reimbursed by National Health System and implicitly approved the off-label uses contained in the list.
KW - Conditioning regimen
KW - Marrow transplant
KW - Off-label
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849155207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849155207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Articolo
AN - SCOPUS:38849155207
SN - 1120-3749
VL - 21
SP - 374
EP - 380
JO - Giornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica
JF - Giornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica
IS - 4
ER -