MonitorNet: The Italian multi-centre observational study aimed at estimating the risk/benefit profile of biologic agents in real-world rheumatology practice

Paolo Sfriso, F. Salaffi, C. M. Montecucco, S. Bombardieri, S. Todesco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

MonitorNet is a database established by the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) in January 2007 and funded by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), for the active long-term follow-up of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis treated with biologic agents. All hospital Rheumatology Units in Italy were invited to participate in a non-interventional, observational, epidemiological study. The study is conducted in a routine clinical setting (real-world practice) where biologics are prescribed on the basis of current recommendations. In this report we describe the design, methodology, and present preliminary data of the study. At the time of the analysis (April 2009) the database included 3510 patients: 2469 (70.3%) with established RA, 675 (19.2%) with PsA and 366 (10.4%) with AS. The cumulative follow up period was 8,787 patient-years (RA: 8,388, PsA: 157; AS: 242). There were 1,538 adverse events in 938 (26.7%) patients. Infections were recorded in 630 patients, skin-related adverse events in 142 and post-infusion reactions in 90. A total of 30 malignancies were reported. An interim analysis of efficacy was conducted on 2,148 RA patients. Seven hundred and thirty-one patients (35.8%) achieved EULAR remission (defined as DAS28

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-139
Number of pages8
JournalReumatismo
Volume61
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Anti-TNF
  • Biological agents
  • Efficacy
  • Observational study
  • Real-world practice
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MonitorNet: The Italian multi-centre observational study aimed at estimating the risk/benefit profile of biologic agents in real-world rheumatology practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this