TY - JOUR
T1 - Mid-term results of a metal-backed glenoid component in total shoulder replacement
AU - Castagna, A.
AU - Randelli, M.
AU - Garofalo, R.
AU - Maradei, L.
AU - Giardella, A.
AU - Borroni, M.
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Total shoulder replacement is a successful procedure for degenerative or some inflammatory diseases of the shoulder. However, fixation of the glenoid seems to be the main weakness with a high rate of loosening. The results using all-polyethylene components have been better than those using metal-backed components. We describe our experience with 35 consecutive total shoulder replacements using a new metal-backed glenoid component with a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (48 to 154). Our implant differs from others because of its mechanism of fixation. It has a convex metal-backed bone interface and the main stabilising factor is a large hollow central peg. The patients were evaulated with standard radiographs and with the Constant Score, the Simple Shoulder Test and a visual analogue scale. All the scores improved and there was no loosening, no polyethylene-glenoid disassembly and no other implant-related complications. We conclude that a metal-backed glenoid component is a good option in total shoulder replacement with no worse results than of those using a cemented all-polyethylene prosthesis.
AB - Total shoulder replacement is a successful procedure for degenerative or some inflammatory diseases of the shoulder. However, fixation of the glenoid seems to be the main weakness with a high rate of loosening. The results using all-polyethylene components have been better than those using metal-backed components. We describe our experience with 35 consecutive total shoulder replacements using a new metal-backed glenoid component with a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (48 to 154). Our implant differs from others because of its mechanism of fixation. It has a convex metal-backed bone interface and the main stabilising factor is a large hollow central peg. The patients were evaulated with standard radiographs and with the Constant Score, the Simple Shoulder Test and a visual analogue scale. All the scores improved and there was no loosening, no polyethylene-glenoid disassembly and no other implant-related complications. We conclude that a metal-backed glenoid component is a good option in total shoulder replacement with no worse results than of those using a cemented all-polyethylene prosthesis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957843823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957843823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.23578
DO - 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.23578
M3 - Article
C2 - 20884980
AN - SCOPUS:77957843823
SN - 0301-620X
VL - 92
SP - 1410
EP - 1415
JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B
JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B
IS - 10
ER -