TY - JOUR
T1 - Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
AU - Moore, K.
AU - Colombo, N.
AU - Scambia, G.
AU - Kim, B.-G.
AU - Oaknin, A.
AU - Friedlander, M.
AU - Lisyanskaya, A.
AU - Floquet, A.
AU - Leary, A.
AU - Sonke, G.S.
AU - Gourley, C.
AU - Banerjee, S.
AU - Oza, A.
AU - González-Martín, A.
AU - Aghajanian, C.
AU - Bradley, W.
AU - Mathews, C.
AU - Liu, J.
AU - Lowe, E.S.
AU - Bloomfield, R.
AU - DiSilvestro, P.
N1 - Cited By :18
Export Date: 5 February 2019
CODEN: NEJMA
Correspondence Address: Moore, K.; Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, 800 NE 10th St., United States; email: kathleen-moore@ouhsc.edu
Chemicals/CAS: olaparib, 763113-22-0; Antineoplastic Agents; olaparib; Phthalazines; Piperazines; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
Funding details: AstraZeneca
Funding details: Merck
Funding details: Novartis
Funding details: Pfizer
Funding details: Roche
Funding details: Takeda Oncology
Funding details: Janssen Biotech
Funding details: Genentech
Funding details: Meso Scale Diagnostics, MSD
Funding details: Novartis, GB2013/053202, GB2015/050352, US12/40805
Funding text 1: A data sharing statement provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. Supported by AstraZeneca and Merck.
Funding text 2: Dr. Moore reports receiving advisory board fees from Astra-Zeneca, Advaxis, Clovis, Tesaro, Genentech (Roche), VBL Therapeutics, ImmunoGen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, OncoMed, and Aravive; Dr. Colombo, receiving advisory board fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Roche, PharmaMar, and Takeda, and advisory board fees from Clovis and Pfizer; Dr. Oaknin, receiving advisory board fees and travel support from Roche, Astra-Zeneca, and PharmaMar, and advisory board fees from Clovis and Tesaro; Dr. Friedlander, receiving grant support, advisory board fees, and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, and advisory board fees from MSD; Dr. Floquet, receiving fees for serving on a medical board from AstraZeneca, Clovis, and Tesaro, and fees for serving on a medical board and financing congress from Roche; Dr. Leary, receiving advisory board fees and travel support from AstraZeneca, advisory board fees from Clovis, Grid-stone, and Pfizer, grant support and advisory board fees from GamaMabs, and grant support from Merus and Sanofi; Dr. Sonke, receiving grant support from Merck, Novartis, and Roche;
Funding text 3: Dr. Gourley, receiving grant support paid to his institution, advisory board fees, and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Tesaro, and NuCana, advisory board fees and lecture fees from Roche, advisory board fees from Clovis and FoundationOne, grant support paid to his institution from Aprea and Novartis, and lecture fees from Chugai, and holding patents (US12/40805, GB2013/053202, and GB2015/050352) on a molecular diagnostic test for cancer; Dr. Banerjee, receiving grant support paid to her institution, advisory board fees, and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, advisory board fees and lecture fees from Tesaro, advisory board fees from Clovis, GamaMabs, and PharmaMar, and lecture fees from Merck; Dr. González-Martín, receiving advisory board fees, lecture fees, and travel support from Roche, Tesaro, and AstraZeneca, and advisory board fees from Clovis; Dr. Aghajanian, receiving advisory board fees from Clovis, Tesaro, ImmunoGen, and Cerulean Pharma, and fees for serving on a steering committee from Mateon Therapeutics; Dr. Liu, receiving advisory board fees from Tesaro, Mersana Therapeutics, and Clovis; Dr. Lowe, being employed by and holding stock options in AstraZeneca; Dr. Bloomfield, being employed by and owning shares in Astra-Zeneca; and Dr. DiSilvestro, receiving consulting fees from Tesaro and AstraZeneca. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References: (2018) National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Ovarian Cancer Version 2, , https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/ovarian.pdf; Ledermann, J.A., Raja, F.A., Fotopoulou, C., Gonzalez-Martin, A., Colombo, N., Sessa, C., Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2013) Ann Oncol, 24, pp. vi24-vi32; Burger, R.A., Brady, M.F., Bookman, M.A., Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer (2011) N Engl J Med, 365, pp. 2473-2483; Perren, T.J., Swart, A.M., Pfisterer, J., A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer (2011) N Engl J Med, 365, pp. 2484-2496; Burger, R.A., Enserro, D., Tewari, K.S., Final overall survival (OS) analysis of an international randomized trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) in the primary treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A NRG oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study (2018) J Clin Oncol, 36, p. 5517. , abstract; O'Connor, M.J., Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer (2015) Mol Cell, 60, pp. 547-560; (2018) AstraZeneca. Lynparza (Olaparib) Tablets, for Oral Use: Prescribing Information, , https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsat.fda_docs/label/2018/208558s001lbl.pdf; (2016) AstraZeneca. Global Policy: Bioethics, , https://www.astrazeneca.com/content/dam/az/PDF/2016/Bioethics_policy.pdf; Norquist, B.M., Brady, M.F., Harrell, M.I., Mutations in homologous recombination genes and outcomes in ovarian carcinoma patients in GOG 218: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study (2018) Clin Cancer Res, 24, pp. 777-783; Alsop, K., Fereday, S., Meldrum, C., BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutationpositive women with ovarian cancer: A report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group (2012) J Clin Oncol, 30, pp. 2654-2663; Coleman, R.L., Oza, A.M., Lorusso, D., Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (2017) Lancet, 390, pp. 1949-1961; Mirza, M.R., Monk, B.J., Herrstedt, J., Niraparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer (2016) N Engl J Med, 375, pp. 2154-2164; Pujade-Lauraine, E., Ledermann, J.A., Selle, F., Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinumsensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (2017) Lancet Oncol, 18, pp. 1274-1284; Gourley, C., Friedlander, M., Matulonis, U.A., Clinically significant long-Term maintenance treatment with olaparib in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer (PSR SOC (2017) J Clin Oncol, 35, p. 5533. , abstract; Ledermann, J.A., Harter, P., Gourley, C., Overall survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer receiving olaparib maintenance monotherapy: An updated analysis from a randomised, placebo-controlled, doubleblind, phase 2 trial (2016) Lancet Oncol, 17, pp. 1579-1589; Osoba, D., Bezjak, A., Brundage, M., Zee, B., Tu, D., Pater, J., Analysis and interpretation of health-related quality-of-life data from clinical trials: Basic approach of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (2005) Eur J Cancer, 41, pp. 280-287
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - 3 years after standard treatment with surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in relapsed disease has been well established, but the benefit of olaparib as maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed disease is uncertain. METHODS We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV) high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian-Tube cancer (or a combination thereof) with a mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or both (BRCA1/2) who had a complete or partial clinical response after platinumbased chemotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 391 patients who underwent randomization, 260 were assigned to receive olaparib and 131 to receive placebo. A total of 388 patients had a centrally confirmed germline BRCA1/2 mutation, and 2 patients had a centrally confirmed somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the risk of disease progression or death was 70% lower with olaparib than with placebo (Kaplan-Meier estimate of the rate of freedom from disease progression and from death at 3 years, 60% vs. 27%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.41; P
AB - 3 years after standard treatment with surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. The benefit of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in relapsed disease has been well established, but the benefit of olaparib as maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed disease is uncertain. METHODS We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV) high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, or fallopian-Tube cancer (or a combination thereof) with a mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2, or both (BRCA1/2) who had a complete or partial clinical response after platinumbased chemotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS Of the 391 patients who underwent randomization, 260 were assigned to receive olaparib and 131 to receive placebo. A total of 388 patients had a centrally confirmed germline BRCA1/2 mutation, and 2 patients had a centrally confirmed somatic BRCA1/2 mutation. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the risk of disease progression or death was 70% lower with olaparib than with placebo (Kaplan-Meier estimate of the rate of freedom from disease progression and from death at 3 years, 60% vs. 27%; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.41; P
KW - antineoplastic agent
KW - nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide adenosine diphosphate ribosyltransferase inhibitor
KW - olaparib
KW - phthalazine derivative
KW - piperazine derivative
KW - adult
KW - clinical trial
KW - controlled study
KW - double blind procedure
KW - endometrioid carcinoma
KW - female
KW - genetics
KW - germline mutation
KW - human
KW - Kaplan Meier method
KW - maintenance chemotherapy
KW - middle aged
KW - multicenter study
KW - multimodality cancer therapy
KW - ovary tumor
KW - peritoneum tumor
KW - phase 2 clinical trial
KW - randomized controlled trial
KW - tumor suppressor gene
KW - uterine tube tumor
KW - Adult
KW - Antineoplastic Agents
KW - Carcinoma, Endometrioid
KW - Combined Modality Therapy
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Fallopian Tube Neoplasms
KW - Female
KW - Genes, BRCA1
KW - Genes, BRCA2
KW - Germ-Line Mutation
KW - Humans
KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
KW - Maintenance Chemotherapy
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Ovarian Neoplasms
KW - Peritoneal Neoplasms
KW - Phthalazines
KW - Piperazines
KW - Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
KW - Progression-Free Survival
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1810858
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1810858
M3 - Article
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 379
SP - 2495
EP - 2505
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 26
ER -