Abstract
The prognostic role of lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was recognized more than three decades ago when the neoplastic clone’s biology was almost unknown. LDT was defined as the time needed for the peripheral blood lymphocyte count to double the of the initial observed value. Herein, the LDT prognostic value for time to first treatment (TTFT) was explored in our prospective O-CLL cohort and validated in in two additional CLL cohorts. Specifically, newly diagnosed Binet stage A CLL patients from 40 Italian Institutions, representative of the whole country, were prospectively enrolled into the O-CLL1-GISL protocol (clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT00917540). Two independent cohorts of newly diagnosed CLL patients recruited respectively at the Division of Hematology in Novara, Italy, and at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, Spain, were utilized as validation cohorts. In the training cohort, TTFT of patients with LDT >12 months was significantly longer related to those with a shorter LDT. At Cox multivariate regression model, LDT ≤ 12 months maintained a significant independent relationship with shorter TTFT along with IGHV unmutated (IGHVunmut) status, 11q and 17p deletions, elevated β2M, Rai stage I-II, and NOTCH1 mutations. Based on these statistics, two regression models were constructed including the same prognostic factors with or without the LDT. The model with the LTD provided a significantly better data fitting (χ2 = 8.25, P=0.0041). The risk prediction developed including LDT had better prognostic accuracy than those without LDT. Moreover, the Harrell’C index for the scores including LDT were higher than those without LDT, although the accepted 0.70 threshold exceeded in both cases. These findings were also confirmed when the same analysis was carried out according to TTFT’s explained variation. When data were further analyzed based on the combination between LDT and IGHV mutational status in the training and validation cohorts, IGHVunmut and LDT>12months group showed a predominant prognostic role over IGHVmut LTD ≤ 12 months (P=0.006) in the O-CLL validation cohort. However, this predominance was of borden-line significance (P=0.06) in the Barcelona group, while the significant prognostic impact was definitely lost in the Novara group. Overall, in this study, we demonstrated that LDT could be re-utilized together with the more sophisticated prognostic factors to manage the follow-up plans for Binet stage A CLL patients.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 684621 |
Journal | Frontiers in Oncology |
Volume | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2 2021 |
Keywords
- CLL
- early stage
- lymphocyte doubling time
- prognosis
- TTFT
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lymphocyte Doubling Time As A Key Prognostic Factor To Predict Time To First Treatment In Early-Stage Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Lymphocyte Doubling Time As A Key Prognostic Factor To Predict Time To First Treatment In Early-Stage Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. / Morabito, Fortunato; Tripepi, Giovanni; Moia, Riccardo et al.
In: Frontiers in Oncology, Vol. 11, 684621, 02.08.2021.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lymphocyte Doubling Time As A Key Prognostic Factor To Predict Time To First Treatment In Early-Stage Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
AU - Morabito, Fortunato
AU - Tripepi, Giovanni
AU - Moia, Riccardo
AU - Recchia, Anna Grazia
AU - Boggione, Paola
AU - Mauro, Francesca Romana
AU - Bossio, Sabrina
AU - D’Arrigo, Graziella
AU - Martino, Enrica Antonia
AU - Vigna, Ernesto
AU - Storino, Francesca
AU - Fronza, Gilberto
AU - Di Raimondo, Francesco
AU - Rossi, Davide
AU - Condoluci, Adalgisa
AU - Colombo, Monica
AU - Fais, Franco
AU - Fabris, Sonia
AU - Foa, Robin
AU - Cutrona, Giovanna
AU - Gentile, Massimo
AU - Montserrat, Emili
AU - Gaidano, Gianluca
AU - Ferrarini, Manlio
AU - Neri, Antonino
N1 - Funding Information: In addition to the listed Authors, the following Investigators participated in this study as part of the Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi (GISL): Gianni Quintana, Divisione di Ematologia, Presidio Ospedaliero ?A.Perrino?, Brindisi; Giovanni Bertoldero, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Ospedale Civile, Noale, Venezia; Paolo Di Tonno, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Ospedale di Venere, Bari; Robin Fo? and Francesca R Mauro, Divisione di Ematologia, Universit? La Sapienza, Roma; Nicola Di Renzo, Unit? di Ematologia, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce; Maria Cristina Cox, Ematologia, A.O. Sant?Andrea, Universit? La Sapienza, Roma; Stefano Molica, Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, Catanzaro; Attilio Guarini, Unit? di Ematologia e Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, Istituto di Oncologia ?Giovanni Paolo II?, Bari; Antonio Abbadessa, U.O.C. di Oncoematologia Ospedale ?S. Anna e S. Sebastiano?, Caserta; Francesco Iuliano, U.O.C. di Oncologia, Ospedale Giannettasio, Rossano Calabro, Cosenza; Omar Racchi, Ospedale Villa Scassi Sampierdarena, Genova; Mauro Spriano, Ematologia, A.O. San Martino, Genova; Felicetto Ferrara, Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Cardarelli, Napoli; Monica Crugnola, Ematologia, CTMO, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma; Alessandro Andriani, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma; Nicola Cascavilla, Unit? di Ematologia e Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo; Lucia Ciuffreda, Unit? di Ematologia, Ospedale San Nicola Pellegrino, Trani; Graziella Pinotti, U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese; Anna Pascarella, Unit? Operativa di Ematologia, Ospedale dell?Angelo, Venezia-Mestre; Maria Grazia Lipari, Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Policlinico, Palermo, Francesco Merli, Unit? Operativa di Ematologia, A.O.S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Luca Baldini Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico C? Granda-Maggiore Policlinico, Milano; Caterina Musolino, Divisione di Ematologia, Universit? di Messina; Agostino Cortelezzi, Ematologia and CTMO, Foundation IRCCS Ca? Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano; Francesco Angrilli, Dipartimento di Ematologia, Ospedale Santo Spirito, Pescara; Ugo Consoli, U.O.S. di Emato-Oncologia, Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Catania; Gianluca Festini, Centro di Riferimento Ematologico-Seconda Medicina, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti, Trieste; Giuseppe Longo, Unit? di Ematologia, Ospedale San Vincenzo, Taormina; Daniele Vallisa and Annalisa Arcari, Unit? di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Onco-Ematologia, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza; Francesco Di Raimondo and Annalisa Chiarenza, Divisione di Ematologia, Universit? di Catania Ospedale Ferrarotto, Catania; Iolanda Vincelli, Unit? di Ematologia, A.O. of Reggio Calabria; Donato Mannina, Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Papardo, Messina, Italy. For Each Institution, the Ethics Review Committee that approved the protocol is listed below. Unit? di Ematologia e Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, Istituto di Oncologia ?Giovanni Paolo II?, Bari comitato etico Istituto di Oncologia ?Giovanni Paolo II?, di Bari, Italy; Dipartimento di Ematologia, Ospedale di Venere, Bari comitato etico Ospedale di Venere,Bari, Italy; U.O.C. Ematologia e Trapianto, Ospedale ?Mons. R. Dimiccoli? -Barletta comitato etico Ospedale ?Mons. R. Dimiccoli? -Barletta, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Presidio Ospedaliero ?A. Perrino?, Brindisi comitato etico Presidio Ospedaliero ?A. Perrino?, Brindisi, Italy; U.O.C. di Oncoematologia Ospedale ?S. Anna e S. Sebastiano?, Caserta comitato etico Ospedale ?S. Anna e S. Sebastiano?, Caserta, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Universit? di Catania Ospedale Ferrarotto, Catania comitato etico Ospedale Ferrarotto, Catania, Italy; U.O.S. di Emato-Oncologia, Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Catania comitato etico Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Catania, Italy, Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, Catanzaro comitato etico Pugliese-Ciaccio Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy; U.O.C di Ematologia, A.O. Cosenza comitato etico A.O. Cosenza, Italy; U.O.C. di Oncologia, Ospedale Giannettasio, Rossano Calabro, Cosenza comitato etico Ospedale Giannettasio, Rossano Calabro, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Policlinico, Palermo, comitato etico Ospedale Policlinico, Palermo, Italy; Ematologia ospedale Goretti, Latina comitato etico ospedale Goretti, Latina, Italy; Clinica Ematologica, DIMI, Genova, comitato etico Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy; Oncologia medica C IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy comitato etico IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino,Genova, Italy; Ospedale Villa Scassi Sampierdarena, Genova comitato etico Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova, Italy; Ematologia, A.O. San Martino, Genova comitato etico A.O. San Martino, Genova, Italy; Unit? di Ematologia, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce comitato etico Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy; UOC di Ematologia Ospedale di Matera comitato etico Ospedale di Matera, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Papardo, Messina, Italy. comitato etico Ospedale Papardo, Messina, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Universit? di Messina comitato etico Ospedale di Messina, Italy; Ematologia and CTMO, Foundation IRCCS Ca? Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano comitato etico Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Italy; Dipartimento di Oncologia, Ospedale Civile, Noale, Venezia comitato etico Ospedale Civile, Noale, Italy; Oncoematologia Policlinico di Modena comitato etico provinciale di Modena, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Cardarelli, Napoli comitato etico Ospedale Cardarelli, Napoli, Italy; Ematologia, CTMO, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma comitato etico Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma, Italy; Dipartimento di Ematologia, Ospedale Santo Spirito, Pescara comitato etico Ospedale Santo Spirito, Pescara, Italy; Unit? di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Onco-Ematologia, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza comitato etico Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy; Unit? di Ematologia, A.O. of Reggio Calabria comitato etico A.O. of Reggio Calabria, Italy; Unit? Operativa di Ematologia, A.O.S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia comitato etico A.O.S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy; S.C. di Ematologia e Trapianto di Cellule Staminali IRCCS-CROB di Rionero in Vulture, Potenza comitato etico IRCCS-CROB di Rionero in Vulture, Italy; Dipartimento di Ematologia, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma comitato etico Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma, Italy; Ematologia, A.O. Sant?Andrea, Universit? La Sapienza, Roma comitato etico A.O. Sant?Andrea, Roma, Italy; Divisione di Ematologia, Universit? La Sapienza, Roma comitato etico Universit? La Sapienza, Roma, Italy; Unit? di Ematologia e Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo comitato etico IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy; Unit? di Ematologia, Ospedale San Vincenzo, Taormina, comitato etico Ospedale San Vincenzo, Taormina, Italy;Unit? di Ematologia, Ospedale San Nicola Pellegrino, Trani comitato etico Ospedale San Nicola Pellegrino, Trani, Italy; Centro di Riferimento Ematologico-Seconda Medicina, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti, Trieste comitato etico Ospedali Riuniti, Trieste, Italy; U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese comitato etico Ospedale di Circolo Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy; Unit? Operativa di Ematologia, Ospedale dell?Angelo, Venezia-Mestre comitato etico Ospedale dell?Angelo, Venezia-Mestre, Italy; Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico C? Granda-Maggiore Policlinico, Milano comitato etico Policlinico, Milano, Italy. Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2021 Morabito, Tripepi, Moia, Recchia, Boggione, Mauro, Bossio, D’Arrigo, Martino, Vigna, Storino, Fronza, Di Raimondo, Rossi, Condoluci, Colombo, Fais, Fabris, Foa, Cutrona, Gentile, Montserrat, Gaidano, Ferrarini and Neri.
PY - 2021/8/2
Y1 - 2021/8/2
N2 - The prognostic role of lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was recognized more than three decades ago when the neoplastic clone’s biology was almost unknown. LDT was defined as the time needed for the peripheral blood lymphocyte count to double the of the initial observed value. Herein, the LDT prognostic value for time to first treatment (TTFT) was explored in our prospective O-CLL cohort and validated in in two additional CLL cohorts. Specifically, newly diagnosed Binet stage A CLL patients from 40 Italian Institutions, representative of the whole country, were prospectively enrolled into the O-CLL1-GISL protocol (clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT00917540). Two independent cohorts of newly diagnosed CLL patients recruited respectively at the Division of Hematology in Novara, Italy, and at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, Spain, were utilized as validation cohorts. In the training cohort, TTFT of patients with LDT >12 months was significantly longer related to those with a shorter LDT. At Cox multivariate regression model, LDT ≤ 12 months maintained a significant independent relationship with shorter TTFT along with IGHV unmutated (IGHVunmut) status, 11q and 17p deletions, elevated β2M, Rai stage I-II, and NOTCH1 mutations. Based on these statistics, two regression models were constructed including the same prognostic factors with or without the LDT. The model with the LTD provided a significantly better data fitting (χ2 = 8.25, P=0.0041). The risk prediction developed including LDT had better prognostic accuracy than those without LDT. Moreover, the Harrell’C index for the scores including LDT were higher than those without LDT, although the accepted 0.70 threshold exceeded in both cases. These findings were also confirmed when the same analysis was carried out according to TTFT’s explained variation. When data were further analyzed based on the combination between LDT and IGHV mutational status in the training and validation cohorts, IGHVunmut and LDT>12months group showed a predominant prognostic role over IGHVmut LTD ≤ 12 months (P=0.006) in the O-CLL validation cohort. However, this predominance was of borden-line significance (P=0.06) in the Barcelona group, while the significant prognostic impact was definitely lost in the Novara group. Overall, in this study, we demonstrated that LDT could be re-utilized together with the more sophisticated prognostic factors to manage the follow-up plans for Binet stage A CLL patients.
AB - The prognostic role of lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was recognized more than three decades ago when the neoplastic clone’s biology was almost unknown. LDT was defined as the time needed for the peripheral blood lymphocyte count to double the of the initial observed value. Herein, the LDT prognostic value for time to first treatment (TTFT) was explored in our prospective O-CLL cohort and validated in in two additional CLL cohorts. Specifically, newly diagnosed Binet stage A CLL patients from 40 Italian Institutions, representative of the whole country, were prospectively enrolled into the O-CLL1-GISL protocol (clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT00917540). Two independent cohorts of newly diagnosed CLL patients recruited respectively at the Division of Hematology in Novara, Italy, and at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, Spain, were utilized as validation cohorts. In the training cohort, TTFT of patients with LDT >12 months was significantly longer related to those with a shorter LDT. At Cox multivariate regression model, LDT ≤ 12 months maintained a significant independent relationship with shorter TTFT along with IGHV unmutated (IGHVunmut) status, 11q and 17p deletions, elevated β2M, Rai stage I-II, and NOTCH1 mutations. Based on these statistics, two regression models were constructed including the same prognostic factors with or without the LDT. The model with the LTD provided a significantly better data fitting (χ2 = 8.25, P=0.0041). The risk prediction developed including LDT had better prognostic accuracy than those without LDT. Moreover, the Harrell’C index for the scores including LDT were higher than those without LDT, although the accepted 0.70 threshold exceeded in both cases. These findings were also confirmed when the same analysis was carried out according to TTFT’s explained variation. When data were further analyzed based on the combination between LDT and IGHV mutational status in the training and validation cohorts, IGHVunmut and LDT>12months group showed a predominant prognostic role over IGHVmut LTD ≤ 12 months (P=0.006) in the O-CLL validation cohort. However, this predominance was of borden-line significance (P=0.06) in the Barcelona group, while the significant prognostic impact was definitely lost in the Novara group. Overall, in this study, we demonstrated that LDT could be re-utilized together with the more sophisticated prognostic factors to manage the follow-up plans for Binet stage A CLL patients.
KW - CLL
KW - early stage
KW - lymphocyte doubling time
KW - prognosis
KW - TTFT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112757845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112757845&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2021.684621
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2021.684621
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85112757845
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 684621
ER -