TY - JOUR
T1 - Lung ultrasound in internal medicine
T2 - A bedside help to increase accuracy in the diagnosis of dyspnea
AU - Perrone, Tiziano
AU - Maggi, Alessia
AU - Sgarlata, Carmelo
AU - Palumbo, Ilaria
AU - Mossolani, Elisa
AU - Ferrari, Sara
AU - Melloul, Ariel
AU - Mussinelli, Roberta
AU - Boldrini, Michele
AU - Raimondi, Ambra
AU - Cabassi, Aderville
AU - Salinaro, Francesco
AU - Perlini, Stefano
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Background Dyspnea is one of the most frequent causes of admission in Internal Medicine wards, leading to a sizeable utilization of medical resources. Study design and methods The role of bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) was evaluated in 130 consecutive patients (age: 81 ± 9 years), in whom blindly collected LUS results were compared with data obtained by clinical examination, medical history, blood analysis, and chest X-ray. Dyspnea etiology was classified as “cardiac” (n = 80), “respiratory” (n = 36) or “mixed” (n = 14), according to the discharge diagnosis (congestive heart failure either alone [n = 80] or associated with pneumonia [n = 14], pneumonia [n = 24], and obstructive disventilatory syndrome [n = 12]). An 8-window LUS protocol was applied to evaluate B-line distribution, “interstitial syndrome” pattern, pleural effusion and images of static or dynamic air bronchogram/focal parenchymal consolidation. Results The presence of a generalized “interstitial syndrome” at the initial LUS evaluation allowed to discriminate “cardiac” from “pulmonary” Dyspnea with high sensitivity (93.75%; confidence intervals: 86.01%–97.94%) and specificity (86.11%; 70.50%–95.33%). Positive and negative predictive values were 93.76% (86.03%–97.94%) and 86.09% (70.47%–95.32%), respectively. Moreover, LUS diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of pneumonia was not inferior to that of chest X-ray. Conclusions Bedside LUS evaluation contributes with high sensitivity and specificity to the differential diagnosis of Dyspnea. This holds true not only in the emergency setting, but also in the sub-acute Internal Medicine arena. A wider use of this portable technique in our wards is warranted.
AB - Background Dyspnea is one of the most frequent causes of admission in Internal Medicine wards, leading to a sizeable utilization of medical resources. Study design and methods The role of bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) was evaluated in 130 consecutive patients (age: 81 ± 9 years), in whom blindly collected LUS results were compared with data obtained by clinical examination, medical history, blood analysis, and chest X-ray. Dyspnea etiology was classified as “cardiac” (n = 80), “respiratory” (n = 36) or “mixed” (n = 14), according to the discharge diagnosis (congestive heart failure either alone [n = 80] or associated with pneumonia [n = 14], pneumonia [n = 24], and obstructive disventilatory syndrome [n = 12]). An 8-window LUS protocol was applied to evaluate B-line distribution, “interstitial syndrome” pattern, pleural effusion and images of static or dynamic air bronchogram/focal parenchymal consolidation. Results The presence of a generalized “interstitial syndrome” at the initial LUS evaluation allowed to discriminate “cardiac” from “pulmonary” Dyspnea with high sensitivity (93.75%; confidence intervals: 86.01%–97.94%) and specificity (86.11%; 70.50%–95.33%). Positive and negative predictive values were 93.76% (86.03%–97.94%) and 86.09% (70.47%–95.32%), respectively. Moreover, LUS diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of pneumonia was not inferior to that of chest X-ray. Conclusions Bedside LUS evaluation contributes with high sensitivity and specificity to the differential diagnosis of Dyspnea. This holds true not only in the emergency setting, but also in the sub-acute Internal Medicine arena. A wider use of this portable technique in our wards is warranted.
KW - Bedside ultrasound
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Internal medicine
KW - Lung congestion
KW - Lung ultrasound
KW - Pneumonia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026844645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026844645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.07.034
DO - 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.07.034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85026844645
SN - 0953-6205
VL - 46
SP - 61
EP - 65
JO - European Journal of Internal Medicine
JF - European Journal of Internal Medicine
ER -