TY - JOUR
T1 - Low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anaesthesia
AU - Casati, Andrea
AU - Fanelli, Guido
AU - Cappelleri, Gianluca
AU - Borghi, Battista
AU - Cedrati, Valeria
AU - Torri, Giorgio
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine concentration in producing unilateral spinal anaesthesia. Methods: With Ethical Committee approval and written consent, 60 patients undergoing lower limb surgery were placed in the lateral position with the side to be operated on dependent. After dural puncture (25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle), the needle hole was turned toward the dependent side and patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 mg of either 0.5% (Group0.5% n = 30) or 1% (Group1%, n = 30) hyperbaric bupivacaine. The lateral position was maintained for 15 min, while a blinded observer recorded loss of pinprick sensation and degree of motor block on both sides until two segment regression of sensory level on the dependent side. Results: At the end of the 15 min lateral position spinal anaesthesia was more frequently unilateral in Group0.5% (80%) than in Group1% (53%)(P <0.05). However, 30 min after patients were turned supine, unilateral spinal anaesthesia decreased to 60% of cases in Group0.5% and 40% of cases in Group1% (P = NS). The maximum sensory level on the dependent side [T10 (L1 -T2) in Group0.5% and T8 (T12 - T3) in Group1%], time to reach it [20 (5 - 30) min in Group0.5% and 25 (10 - 35) min in Group1%], and time to two segment regression of sensory level [80 (30 - 135) min in Group0.5% and 75 (20 - 135) min in Group1%] were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Highly concentrated solutions of hyperbaric bupivacaine are not advantageous in obtaining a unilateral spinal anaesthesia, when a small anaesthetic dose is injected slowly through a Whitacre spinal needle.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine concentration in producing unilateral spinal anaesthesia. Methods: With Ethical Committee approval and written consent, 60 patients undergoing lower limb surgery were placed in the lateral position with the side to be operated on dependent. After dural puncture (25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle), the needle hole was turned toward the dependent side and patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 mg of either 0.5% (Group0.5% n = 30) or 1% (Group1%, n = 30) hyperbaric bupivacaine. The lateral position was maintained for 15 min, while a blinded observer recorded loss of pinprick sensation and degree of motor block on both sides until two segment regression of sensory level on the dependent side. Results: At the end of the 15 min lateral position spinal anaesthesia was more frequently unilateral in Group0.5% (80%) than in Group1% (53%)(P <0.05). However, 30 min after patients were turned supine, unilateral spinal anaesthesia decreased to 60% of cases in Group0.5% and 40% of cases in Group1% (P = NS). The maximum sensory level on the dependent side [T10 (L1 -T2) in Group0.5% and T8 (T12 - T3) in Group1%], time to reach it [20 (5 - 30) min in Group0.5% and 25 (10 - 35) min in Group1%], and time to two segment regression of sensory level [80 (30 - 135) min in Group0.5% and 75 (20 - 135) min in Group1%] were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Highly concentrated solutions of hyperbaric bupivacaine are not advantageous in obtaining a unilateral spinal anaesthesia, when a small anaesthetic dose is injected slowly through a Whitacre spinal needle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032426322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032426322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9818107
AN - SCOPUS:0032426322
SN - 0832-610X
VL - 45
SP - 850
EP - 854
JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 9
ER -