TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated frontline with imatinib
AU - Castagnetti, F.
AU - Gugliotta, G.
AU - Breccia, M.
AU - Stagno, F.
AU - Iurlo, A.
AU - Albano, F.
AU - Abruzzese, E.
AU - Martino, B.
AU - Levato, L.
AU - Intermesoli, T.
AU - Pregno, P.
AU - Rossi, G.
AU - Gherlinzoni, F.
AU - Leoni, P.
AU - Cavazzini, F.
AU - Venturi, C.
AU - Soverini, S.
AU - Testoni, N.
AU - Alimena, G.
AU - Cavo, M.
AU - Martinelli, G.
AU - Pane, F.
AU - Saglio, G.
AU - Rosti, G.
AU - Baccarani, M.
PY - 2015/9/4
Y1 - 2015/9/4
N2 - For almost 10 years imatinib has been the therapeutic standard of chronic myeloid leukemia. The introduction of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) raised a debate on treatment optimization. The debate is still heated: some studies have protocol restrictions or limited follow-up; in other studies, some relevant data are missing. The aim of this report is to provide a comprehensive, long-term, intention-to-treat, analysis of 559 newly diagnosed, chronic-phase, patients treated frontline with imatinib. With a minimum follow-up of 66 months, 65% of patients were still on imatinib, 19% were on alternative treatment, 12% died and 4% were lost to follow-up. The prognostic value of BCR-ABL1 ratio at 3 months (≤10% in 81% of patients) was confirmed. The prognostic value of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response at 1 year was confirmed. The 6-year overall survival was 89%, but as 50% of deaths occurred in remission, the 6-year cumulative incidence of leukemia-related death was 5%. The long-term outcome of first-line imatinib was excellent, also because of second-line treatment with other TKIs, but all responses and outcomes were inferior in high-risk patients, suggesting that to optimize treatment results, a specific risk-adapted treatment is needed for such patients.
AB - For almost 10 years imatinib has been the therapeutic standard of chronic myeloid leukemia. The introduction of other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) raised a debate on treatment optimization. The debate is still heated: some studies have protocol restrictions or limited follow-up; in other studies, some relevant data are missing. The aim of this report is to provide a comprehensive, long-term, intention-to-treat, analysis of 559 newly diagnosed, chronic-phase, patients treated frontline with imatinib. With a minimum follow-up of 66 months, 65% of patients were still on imatinib, 19% were on alternative treatment, 12% died and 4% were lost to follow-up. The prognostic value of BCR-ABL1 ratio at 3 months (≤10% in 81% of patients) was confirmed. The prognostic value of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response at 1 year was confirmed. The 6-year overall survival was 89%, but as 50% of deaths occurred in remission, the 6-year cumulative incidence of leukemia-related death was 5%. The long-term outcome of first-line imatinib was excellent, also because of second-line treatment with other TKIs, but all responses and outcomes were inferior in high-risk patients, suggesting that to optimize treatment results, a specific risk-adapted treatment is needed for such patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940757131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940757131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/leu.2015.152
DO - 10.1038/leu.2015.152
M3 - Article
C2 - 26088952
AN - SCOPUS:84940757131
SN - 0887-6924
VL - 29
SP - 1823
EP - 1831
JO - Leukemia
JF - Leukemia
IS - 9
ER -