TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic ablation therapies or hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
AU - Santambrogio, Roberto
AU - Kluger, Michael D.
AU - Costa, Mara
AU - Salceda, Juan
AU - Belli, Andrea
AU - Laurent, Alexis
AU - Barabino, Matteo
AU - Opocher, E.
AU - Azoulay, D.
AU - Cherqui, Daniel
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - Background: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system recommends radiofrequency ablation as treatment of choice for patients with "small" (up to 2 cm in size) hepatocellular carcinoma. Aims: Aim of the study was to assess whether laparoscopic ablation therapies or hepatic resection could be proposed as alternative option if percutaneous approach is not feasible. Methods: Overall survival and tumour recurrence rate were compared in a retrospective cohort of 176 consecutive patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis treated by laparoscopic ablation therapies or surgery. To balance the covariates between the two groups, a propensity case-matched analysis was developed to generate a matched sample, which included 76 patients in each arm. Results: Local tumour progression (p = 0.005), intra-segmental recurrence (p = 0.0001), and 5-year recurrence rates (80% vs. 60%; p = 0.0014) were significantly higher in the ablation therapies group. The 5-year survival rate were 48% after ablation therapies and 69% after hepatic resection (p = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis showed that MELD score, alpha-fetoprotein value, procedure category and intraoperative restaging were associated with survival, while the surgery was the only independent predictor of intra-hepatic recurrence. Conclusions: The present study suggests that, if percutaneous ablation is not feasible, hepatic resection may be considered as a sound option in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.
AB - Background: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system recommends radiofrequency ablation as treatment of choice for patients with "small" (up to 2 cm in size) hepatocellular carcinoma. Aims: Aim of the study was to assess whether laparoscopic ablation therapies or hepatic resection could be proposed as alternative option if percutaneous approach is not feasible. Methods: Overall survival and tumour recurrence rate were compared in a retrospective cohort of 176 consecutive patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis treated by laparoscopic ablation therapies or surgery. To balance the covariates between the two groups, a propensity case-matched analysis was developed to generate a matched sample, which included 76 patients in each arm. Results: Local tumour progression (p = 0.005), intra-segmental recurrence (p = 0.0001), and 5-year recurrence rates (80% vs. 60%; p = 0.0014) were significantly higher in the ablation therapies group. The 5-year survival rate were 48% after ablation therapies and 69% after hepatic resection (p = 0.0006). Multivariate analysis showed that MELD score, alpha-fetoprotein value, procedure category and intraoperative restaging were associated with survival, while the surgery was the only independent predictor of intra-hepatic recurrence. Conclusions: The present study suggests that, if percutaneous ablation is not feasible, hepatic resection may be considered as a sound option in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma.
KW - Hepatic resection
KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - Laparoscopic ablation therapies
KW - Liver cirrhosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957845923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957845923&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.010
M3 - Article
SN - 1590-8658
VL - 48
SP - 189
EP - 196
JO - Digestive and Liver Disease
JF - Digestive and Liver Disease
IS - 2
ER -