TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravascular ultrasound based dose assessment in endovascular brachytherapy
AU - Catalano, Gianpiero
AU - Tamburini, Vittorio
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Nishida, Takahiro
AU - Parisi, Giovanni
AU - Mazzetta, Chiara
AU - Orecchia, Roberto
PY - 2003/8
Y1 - 2003/8
N2 - Background: the role of endovascular brachytherapy in restenosis prevention is well documented. Dose is usually prescribed at a fixed distance from the source axis by angiographic quantification of vessel diameter. Recently, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was introduced in dose prescription, allowing a better evaluation of the vessel anatomy. This study retrospectively explores the difference between prescription following angiographic vessel sizing and delivered dose calculated with IVUS. Methods and results: Seventeen lesions were studied with IVUS, identifying on irradiated segment, three sections on which measuring minimal and maximal distance from the centre of IVUS catheter to the adventitia; using dedicated software, corresponding doses were calculated. The dose ranged widely, with maximal and minimal values of 71. 6 and 4.9Gy; furthermore, heterogeneity in dose among different sections was observed. In the central section, the maximal dose was 206% of the one prescribed with the QCA model at 2 mm from the source axis, while the minimal dose was 96%. In proximal and distal sections, respective values were 182, 45, 243, and 122%. Conclusions: Our analysis confirmed the dose inhomogeneity delivered with an angiographic fixed-dose prescription strategy. A dose variation was found along the irradiated segment due to the differences in vessel thickness. IVUS emerged as an important tool in endovascular brachytherapy, especially for irregular-shaped vessels.
AB - Background: the role of endovascular brachytherapy in restenosis prevention is well documented. Dose is usually prescribed at a fixed distance from the source axis by angiographic quantification of vessel diameter. Recently, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was introduced in dose prescription, allowing a better evaluation of the vessel anatomy. This study retrospectively explores the difference between prescription following angiographic vessel sizing and delivered dose calculated with IVUS. Methods and results: Seventeen lesions were studied with IVUS, identifying on irradiated segment, three sections on which measuring minimal and maximal distance from the centre of IVUS catheter to the adventitia; using dedicated software, corresponding doses were calculated. The dose ranged widely, with maximal and minimal values of 71. 6 and 4.9Gy; furthermore, heterogeneity in dose among different sections was observed. In the central section, the maximal dose was 206% of the one prescribed with the QCA model at 2 mm from the source axis, while the minimal dose was 96%. In proximal and distal sections, respective values were 182, 45, 243, and 122%. Conclusions: Our analysis confirmed the dose inhomogeneity delivered with an angiographic fixed-dose prescription strategy. A dose variation was found along the irradiated segment due to the differences in vessel thickness. IVUS emerged as an important tool in endovascular brachytherapy, especially for irregular-shaped vessels.
KW - Angioplasty
KW - Endovascular brachytherapy
KW - Intravascular ultrasound
KW - Restenosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542709571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542709571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00130-0
DO - 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00130-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 12972316
AN - SCOPUS:1542709571
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 68
SP - 199
EP - 206
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 2
ER -