TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpretation of colposcopy in population-based cervical screening services in north-eastern Italy
T2 - an online interregional agreement study
AU - Garutti, Paola
AU - Cristiani, Paolo
AU - Fantin, Gian P.
AU - Sopracordevole, Francesco
AU - Costa, Silvano
AU - Schincaglia, Patrizia
AU - Ravaioli, Alessandra
AU - Sassoli de Bianchi, Priscilla
AU - Naldoni, Carlo
AU - Ferretti, Stefano
AU - Bucchi, Lauro
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Objective An innovative web-based colposcopy quality assurance programme was implemented in population-based cervical screening services in three north-eastern Italian administrative regions with different colposcopists’ training background. In this study, the levels of intra- and interregional intercolposcopist diagnostic agreement were evaluated. Study design Of the 158 registered colposcopists, 125 accessed the website of the programme, logged-in, viewed a posted set of 50 digital colpophotographs selected by an expert steering committee, and classified them for the colposcopic impression, the visibility of the squamocolumnar junction, and the need for biopsy. Anonymous data were downloaded and analysed using the crude, or observed, proportion of agreement and the kappa coefficient. Results There were 113 eligible colposcopists. Overall, crude agreement on the colposcopic impression, the visibility of the squamocolumnar junction, and the need for biopsy was 0.72, 0.72, and 0.87, with kappa values of 0.60, 0.36, and 0.69, respectively. The homologous kappa values were 0.61, 0.41, and 0.69 in one region, 0.57, 0.36, and 0.69 in another, and 0.66, 0.38, and 0.74 in the third. Total intra- and interregional agreement were nearly identical, with kappa values of 0.59 and 0.60 for the colposcopic impression, 0.38 and 0.35 for the visibility of the squamocolumnar junction, and 0.69 and 0.69 for the need for biopsy. The width of 95% confidence intervals around the above kappa values was ≤0.01. Conclusions The levels of agreement varied between moderate and substantial both within and between regions. Regional differences in training background had minor effects. The interpretation of colposcopy is potentially well-reproducible.
AB - Objective An innovative web-based colposcopy quality assurance programme was implemented in population-based cervical screening services in three north-eastern Italian administrative regions with different colposcopists’ training background. In this study, the levels of intra- and interregional intercolposcopist diagnostic agreement were evaluated. Study design Of the 158 registered colposcopists, 125 accessed the website of the programme, logged-in, viewed a posted set of 50 digital colpophotographs selected by an expert steering committee, and classified them for the colposcopic impression, the visibility of the squamocolumnar junction, and the need for biopsy. Anonymous data were downloaded and analysed using the crude, or observed, proportion of agreement and the kappa coefficient. Results There were 113 eligible colposcopists. Overall, crude agreement on the colposcopic impression, the visibility of the squamocolumnar junction, and the need for biopsy was 0.72, 0.72, and 0.87, with kappa values of 0.60, 0.36, and 0.69, respectively. The homologous kappa values were 0.61, 0.41, and 0.69 in one region, 0.57, 0.36, and 0.69 in another, and 0.66, 0.38, and 0.74 in the third. Total intra- and interregional agreement were nearly identical, with kappa values of 0.59 and 0.60 for the colposcopic impression, 0.38 and 0.35 for the visibility of the squamocolumnar junction, and 0.69 and 0.69 for the need for biopsy. The width of 95% confidence intervals around the above kappa values was ≤0.01. Conclusions The levels of agreement varied between moderate and substantial both within and between regions. Regional differences in training background had minor effects. The interpretation of colposcopy is potentially well-reproducible.
KW - Cervical cancer screening
KW - Colposcopy
KW - Internet
KW - Interobserver agreement
KW - Quality assurance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988019846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988019846&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.037
DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.037
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84988019846
SN - 0028-2243
VL - 206
SP - 64
EP - 69
JO - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
JF - European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
ER -