International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring

T Danne, R Nimri, T Battelino, RM Bergenstal, KL Close, JH DeVries, S Garg, L Heinemann, I Hirsch, SA Amiel, R Beck, E Bosi, B Buckingham, C Cobelli, E Dassau, FJ Doyle, S Heller, R Hovorka, W Jia, T JonesO Kordonouri, B Kovatchev, A Kowalski, L Laffel, D Maahs, HR Murphy, K Nørgaard, CG Parkin, E Renard, B Saboo, M Scharf, WV Tamborlane, SA Weinzimer, M Phillip

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) has been the traditional method for assessing glycemic control. However, it does not reflect intra- and interday glycemic excursions that may lead to acute events (such as hypoglycemia) or postprandial hyperglycemia, which have been linked to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), either from real-time use (rtCGM) or intermittently viewed (iCGM), addresses many of the limitations inherent in HbA 1c testing and self-monitoring of blood glucose. Although both provide themeans to move beyond the HbA 1c measurement as the sole marker of glycemic control, standardized metrics for analyzing CGM data are lacking. Moreover, clear criteria for matching people with diabetes to themost appropriate glucose monitoring methodologies, as well as standardized advice about howbest to use the new information they provide, have yet to be established. In February 2017, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address these issues. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations and represents the current understanding of how CGM results can affect outcomes. © 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1631-1640
Number of pages10
JournalDiabetes Care
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this