TY - JOUR
T1 - Inflammatory indices and clinical factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab
T2 - the development of a novel prognostic score (Meet-URO 15 study)
AU - Rebuzzi, Sara Elena
AU - Signori, Alessio
AU - Banna, Giuseppe Luigi
AU - Maruzzo, Marco
AU - De Giorgi, Ugo
AU - Pedrazzoli, Paolo
AU - Sbrana, Andrea
AU - Zucali, Paolo Andrea
AU - Masini, Cristina
AU - Naglieri, Emanuele
AU - Procopio, Giuseppe
AU - Merler, Sara
AU - Tomasello, Laura
AU - Fratino, Lucia
AU - Baldessari, Cinzia
AU - Ricotta, Riccardo
AU - Panni, Stefano
AU - Mollica, Veronica
AU - Sorarù, Maria
AU - Santoni, Matteo
AU - Cortellini, Alessio
AU - Prati, Veronica
AU - Soto Parra, Hector Josè
AU - Stellato, Marco
AU - Atzori, Francesco
AU - Pignata, Sandro
AU - Messina, Carlo
AU - Messina, Marco
AU - Morelli, Franco
AU - Prati, Giuseppe
AU - Nolè, Franco
AU - Vignani, Francesca
AU - Cavo, Alessia
AU - Roviello, Giandomenico
AU - Pierantoni, Francesco
AU - Casadei, Chiara
AU - Bersanelli, Melissa
AU - Chiellino, Silvia
AU - Paolieri, Federico
AU - Perrino, Matteo
AU - Brunelli, Matteo
AU - Iacovelli, Roberto
AU - Porta, Camillo
AU - Buti, Sebastiano
AU - Fornarini, Giuseppe
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2018–2021 grants) that financially support their current research focused on the identification of prognostic and predictive markers for patients with genitourinary tumors.
Funding Information:
The authors wish to really thank Dr. Luca Carmisciano of the Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Section of Biostatistics of University of Genoa, for developing the web calculator of the Meet URO score. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente 2018?2021 grants) that financially support their current research focused on the identification of prognostic and predictive markers for patients with genitourinary tumors.
Funding Information:
Dr Fornarini services advisory boards for Astellas, Janssen, Pfizer, Bayer, MSD, and Merck, and received travel accommodation from Astellas, Janssen, and Bayer. Dr Buti received honoraria as a speaker at scientific events and in an advisory role by BMS, Pfizer; MSD, Ipsen, Roche, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis. Dr Banna reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Pierre Fabre, IPSEN, outside the submitted work. Dr De Giorgi services as an advisory/board member of Astellas, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, IPSEN, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi, received research grant/funding to the institution from AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi, and travel/accommodations/expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb, IPSEN, Janssen, and Pfizer. Dr Zucali services advisory boards/consulting for Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, IPSEN, Novartis, Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, and Astellas. Dr Masini received personal fees as a speaker from Astellas, as a consultant from IPSEN, MSD, and Janssen, and for travel accommodation from BMS, Pfizer, Astellas, Janssen, and IPSEN. Dr Procopio services advisory boards/consulting for Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, IPSEN, Merk, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Cortellini receives speaker fees/grant consultancies from Astrazeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, and Astellas. Dr Morelli received grants from MSD and Pfizer. Dr Bersanelli received research funding to the institution from Roche, Pfizer, Seqirus UK, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Sanofi, and received personal fees for advisory role, copyright transfer, consultancies, and as speaker at scientific events from Sciclone Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, and Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Despite the survival advantage, not all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients achieve a long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Moreover, the identification of prognostic biomarkers is still an unmet clinical need. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of peripheral-blood inflammatory indices and clinical factors to develop a novel prognostic score in mRCC patients receiving at least second-line nivolumab. The complete blood count before the first cycle of therapy was assessed by calculating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). Clinical factors included pre-treatment International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score, line of therapy, and metastatic sites. Results: From October 2015 to November 2019, 571 mRCC patients received nivolumab as second- and further-line treatment in 69% and 31% of cases. In univariable and multivariable analyses all inflammatory indices, IMDC score, and bone metastases significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). The multivariable model with NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had the highest c-index (0.697) and was chosen for the developing of the score (Schneeweiss scoring system). After internal validation (bootstrap re-sampling), the final index (Meet-URO score) composed by NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had a c-index of 0.691. It identified five categories with distinctive OSs: group 1 (median OS – mOS = not reached), group 2 (mOS = 43.9 months), group 3 (mOS = 22.4 months), group 4 (mOS = 10.3 months), and group 5 (mOS = 3.2 months). Moreover, the Meet-URO score allowed for a fine risk-stratification across all three IMDC groups. Conclusion: The Meet-URO score allowed for the accurate stratification of pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab and is easily applicable for clinical practice at no additional cost. Future steps include its external validation, the assessment of its predictivity, and its application to first-line combinations.
AB - Background: Despite the survival advantage, not all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients achieve a long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Moreover, the identification of prognostic biomarkers is still an unmet clinical need. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of peripheral-blood inflammatory indices and clinical factors to develop a novel prognostic score in mRCC patients receiving at least second-line nivolumab. The complete blood count before the first cycle of therapy was assessed by calculating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). Clinical factors included pre-treatment International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score, line of therapy, and metastatic sites. Results: From October 2015 to November 2019, 571 mRCC patients received nivolumab as second- and further-line treatment in 69% and 31% of cases. In univariable and multivariable analyses all inflammatory indices, IMDC score, and bone metastases significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). The multivariable model with NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had the highest c-index (0.697) and was chosen for the developing of the score (Schneeweiss scoring system). After internal validation (bootstrap re-sampling), the final index (Meet-URO score) composed by NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had a c-index of 0.691. It identified five categories with distinctive OSs: group 1 (median OS – mOS = not reached), group 2 (mOS = 43.9 months), group 3 (mOS = 22.4 months), group 4 (mOS = 10.3 months), and group 5 (mOS = 3.2 months). Moreover, the Meet-URO score allowed for a fine risk-stratification across all three IMDC groups. Conclusion: The Meet-URO score allowed for the accurate stratification of pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab and is easily applicable for clinical practice at no additional cost. Future steps include its external validation, the assessment of its predictivity, and its application to first-line combinations.
KW - biomarkers
KW - clinical factors
KW - immune checkpoint inhibitor
KW - immunotherapy
KW - prognostic score
KW - renal cell carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107317392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107317392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17588359211019642
DO - 10.1177/17588359211019642
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107317392
SN - 1758-8340
VL - 13
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
ER -