TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of treatment expertise on the outcome of patients with head and neck cancer treated within 6 randomized trials
AU - Bossi, Paolo
AU - Miceli, Rosalba
AU - Benasso, Marco
AU - Corvò, Renzo
AU - Bacigalupo, Andrea
AU - Sanguineti, Giuseppe
AU - Fallai, Carlo
AU - Merlano, Marlo C.
AU - Infante, Gabriele
AU - Dani, Carla
AU - Di Giannantonio, Valerio
AU - Licitra, Lisa
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background: We evaluated the impact of center expertise, in terms of number of patients treated, on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: We performed a pooled analysis including data from 6 randomized trials in head and neck SCC conducted in Italy. We evaluated the association between OS or PFS and the number of patients recruited by the center. Results: The outcome of 903 patients who had received radiotherapy (RT) was analyzed (median follow-up 76 months). The hazard ratio (HR) comparing the third and the first quartiles of the distribution of number of patients per center showed an advantage in PFS (HR 0.59, range 0.53-0.65, P <.0001) and in OS (HR 0.70, 0.60-0.81, P <.0001) for centers with a higher number of patients recruited. A similar benefit was observed in PFS (HR 0.63, 0.60-0.66) and OS (HR 0.74, 0.69-0.79) considering the mean number of patients per year. Conclusions: The PFS and OS were longer for patients treated in high-case-volume centers.
AB - Background: We evaluated the impact of center expertise, in terms of number of patients treated, on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: We performed a pooled analysis including data from 6 randomized trials in head and neck SCC conducted in Italy. We evaluated the association between OS or PFS and the number of patients recruited by the center. Results: The outcome of 903 patients who had received radiotherapy (RT) was analyzed (median follow-up 76 months). The hazard ratio (HR) comparing the third and the first quartiles of the distribution of number of patients per center showed an advantage in PFS (HR 0.59, range 0.53-0.65, P <.0001) and in OS (HR 0.70, 0.60-0.81, P <.0001) for centers with a higher number of patients recruited. A similar benefit was observed in PFS (HR 0.63, 0.60-0.66) and OS (HR 0.74, 0.69-0.79) considering the mean number of patients per year. Conclusions: The PFS and OS were longer for patients treated in high-case-volume centers.
KW - HNCC
KW - referral centers
KW - survival
KW - treatment expertise
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056624660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056624660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hed.25389
DO - 10.1002/hed.25389
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056624660
SN - 1043-3074
JO - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Head and Neck Surgery
ER -