TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Angiographic Result After Predilatation on Outcome After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of In-Stent Coronary Restenosis
AU - Tanaka, Akihito
AU - Latib, Azeem
AU - Jabbour, Richard J.
AU - Kawamoto, Hiroyoshi
AU - Giannini, Francesco
AU - Ancona, Marco
AU - Regazzoli, Damiano
AU - Mangieri, Antonio
AU - Mattioli, Roberto
AU - Chieffo, Alaide
AU - Carlino, Mauro
AU - Montorfano, Matteo
AU - Colombo, Antonio
PY - 2016/11/15
Y1 - 2016/11/15
N2 - This study investigates clinical outcomes after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) based on the angiographic result achieved after predilatation and before DCB treatment. Among ISR lesions treated with DCBs, 166 lesions with angiography immediately after predilatation were analyzed. The lesions were divided into 2 groups according to angiographic results after predilatation: (1) “adequate” defined as the presence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow, residual stenosis ≤30%, and no major dissections (n = 98 lesions) or (2) “inadequate” (n = 68 lesions). The reference vessel diameters were larger (2.88 ± 0.39 vs 2.64 ± 0.52 mm, p = 0.001) and lesion lengths shorter in the adequate group (15.4 ± 11.2 vs 19.7 ± 13.9 mm, p = 0.04). During a median follow-up of 808 days, the cumulative target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was lower in the adequate group (20.3% vs 35.5% at 2 years; p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis indicated that an angiographically inadequate result before DCB treatment was an independent predictor of TLR, even after adjusting for reference vessel diameter and lesion length (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 3.87, p = 0.04). In conclusion, angiographic results after lesion preparation appear to be a good predictor of TLR after DCB treatment for ISR.
AB - This study investigates clinical outcomes after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR) based on the angiographic result achieved after predilatation and before DCB treatment. Among ISR lesions treated with DCBs, 166 lesions with angiography immediately after predilatation were analyzed. The lesions were divided into 2 groups according to angiographic results after predilatation: (1) “adequate” defined as the presence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow, residual stenosis ≤30%, and no major dissections (n = 98 lesions) or (2) “inadequate” (n = 68 lesions). The reference vessel diameters were larger (2.88 ± 0.39 vs 2.64 ± 0.52 mm, p = 0.001) and lesion lengths shorter in the adequate group (15.4 ± 11.2 vs 19.7 ± 13.9 mm, p = 0.04). During a median follow-up of 808 days, the cumulative target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was lower in the adequate group (20.3% vs 35.5% at 2 years; p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis indicated that an angiographically inadequate result before DCB treatment was an independent predictor of TLR, even after adjusting for reference vessel diameter and lesion length (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 3.87, p = 0.04). In conclusion, angiographic results after lesion preparation appear to be a good predictor of TLR after DCB treatment for ISR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994121218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994121218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.006
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84994121218
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 118
SP - 1460
EP - 1465
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 10
ER -