TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of miR-31-5p, miR-141-3p, miR-200c-3p, and GLT1 as human liver aging markers sensitive to donor–recipient age-mismatch in transplants
AU - Capri, Miriam
AU - Olivieri, Fabiola
AU - Lanzarini, Catia
AU - Remondini, Daniel
AU - Borelli, Vincenzo
AU - Lazzarini, Raffaella
AU - Graciotti, Laura
AU - Albertini, Maria Cristina
AU - Bellavista, Elena
AU - Santoro, Aurelia
AU - Biondi, Fiammetta
AU - Tagliafico, Enrico
AU - Tenedini, Elena
AU - Morsiani, Cristina
AU - Pizza, Grazia
AU - Vasuri, Francesco
AU - D'Errico, Antonietta
AU - Dazzi, Alessandro
AU - Pellegrini, Sara
AU - Magenta, Alessandra
AU - D'Agostino, Marco
AU - Capogrossi, Maurizio C.
AU - Cescon, Matteo
AU - Rippo, Maria Rita
AU - Procopio, Antonio Domenico
AU - Franceschi, Claudio
AU - Grazi, Gian Luca
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - To understand why livers from aged donors are successfully used for transplants, we looked for markers of liver aging in 71 biopsies from donors aged 12–92 years before transplants and in 11 biopsies after transplants with high donor–recipient age-mismatch. We also assessed liver function in 36 age-mismatched recipients. The major findings were the following: (i) miR-31-5p, miR-141-3p, and miR-200c-3p increased with age, as assessed by microRNAs (miRs) and mRNA transcript profiling in 12 biopsies and results were validated by RT–qPCR in a total of 58 biopsies; (ii) telomere length measured by qPCR in 45 samples showed a significant age-dependent shortage; (iii) a bioinformatic approach combining transcriptome and miRs data identified putative miRs targets, the most informative being GLT1, a glutamate transporter expressed in hepatocytes. GLT1 was demonstrated by luciferase assay to be a target of miR-31-5p and miR-200c-3p, and both its mRNA (RT–qPCR) and protein (immunohistochemistry) significantly decreased with age in liver biopsies and in hepatic centrilobular zone, respectively; (iv) miR-31-5p, miR-141-3p and miR-200c-3p expression was significantly affected by recipient age (older environment) as assessed in eleven cases of donor–recipient extreme age-mismatch; (v) the analysis of recipients plasma by N-glycans profiling, capable of assessing liver functions and biological age, showed that liver function recovered after transplants, independently of age-mismatch, and recipients apparently ‘rejuvenated’ according to their glycomic age. In conclusion, we identified new markers of aging in human liver, their relevance in donor–recipient age-mismatches in transplantation, and offered positive evidence for the use of organs from old donors.
AB - To understand why livers from aged donors are successfully used for transplants, we looked for markers of liver aging in 71 biopsies from donors aged 12–92 years before transplants and in 11 biopsies after transplants with high donor–recipient age-mismatch. We also assessed liver function in 36 age-mismatched recipients. The major findings were the following: (i) miR-31-5p, miR-141-3p, and miR-200c-3p increased with age, as assessed by microRNAs (miRs) and mRNA transcript profiling in 12 biopsies and results were validated by RT–qPCR in a total of 58 biopsies; (ii) telomere length measured by qPCR in 45 samples showed a significant age-dependent shortage; (iii) a bioinformatic approach combining transcriptome and miRs data identified putative miRs targets, the most informative being GLT1, a glutamate transporter expressed in hepatocytes. GLT1 was demonstrated by luciferase assay to be a target of miR-31-5p and miR-200c-3p, and both its mRNA (RT–qPCR) and protein (immunohistochemistry) significantly decreased with age in liver biopsies and in hepatic centrilobular zone, respectively; (iv) miR-31-5p, miR-141-3p and miR-200c-3p expression was significantly affected by recipient age (older environment) as assessed in eleven cases of donor–recipient extreme age-mismatch; (v) the analysis of recipients plasma by N-glycans profiling, capable of assessing liver functions and biological age, showed that liver function recovered after transplants, independently of age-mismatch, and recipients apparently ‘rejuvenated’ according to their glycomic age. In conclusion, we identified new markers of aging in human liver, their relevance in donor–recipient age-mismatches in transplantation, and offered positive evidence for the use of organs from old donors.
KW - age-mismatches
KW - allograft
KW - elderly donors
KW - GLT1
KW - microRNAs
KW - N-glycans
KW - telomere length
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007240054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007240054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acel.12549
DO - 10.1111/acel.12549
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85007240054
SN - 1474-9718
VL - 16
SP - 262
EP - 272
JO - Aging Cell
JF - Aging Cell
IS - 2
ER -