Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for childhood ependymoma: Final results of the first prospective AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia-Oncologia Pediatrica) study

Maura Massimino, Lorenza Gandola, Felice Giangaspero, Alessandro Sandri, Pinuccia Valagussa, Giorgio Perilongo, Maria Luisa Garrè, Umberto Ricardi, Marco Forni, Lorenzo Genitori, Giovanni Scarzello, Filippo Spreafico, Salvina Barra, Maurizio Mascarin, Bianca Pollo, Martina Gardiman, Armando Cama, Pierina Navarria, Maurizio Brisigotti, Paola ColliniRita Balter, Paola Fidani, Maurizio Stefanelli, Roberta Burnelli, Paolo Potepan, Marta Podda, Guido Sotti, Enrico Madon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose A postsurgical "stage-based" protocol for ependymoma was designed. Methods and materials Children were given: (1) focal hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) if with no evidence of disease (NED), or (2) 4 courses with VEC followed by HFRT for residual disease (ED). HFRT dose was 70.4 Gy (1.1 Gy/fraction b.i.d.); VEC consisted of VCR 1.5 mg/m2 1/w, VP16 100 mg/m2/day × 3, CTX 3 g/m2 d 1. When feasible, second-look surgery was recommended. Results Sixty-three consecutive children were enrolled: 46 NED, 17 ED; the tumor was infratentorial in 47 and supratentorial in 16, with spinal metastasis in 1. Of NED patients, 35 of 46 have been treated with HFRT; 8 received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, and 3 received no treatment. Of the 17 ED patients, 9 received VEC + HFRT; violations due to postsurgical morbidity were as follows: HFRT only (2), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (3) + VEC (2), and no therapy (1). Objective responses to VEC were seen in 54%; objective responses to RT were seen in 75%. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years for all 63 children were 75% and 56%, respectively; for the NED subgroup, 82% and 65%; and for the ED subgroup, 61% and 35%, respectively. All histologies were centrally reviewed. At multivariate analysis, grading, age, and site proved significant for prognosis. Conclusions HFRT, despite the high total dose adopted, did not change the prognosis of childhood ependymoma as compared to historical series: New radiotherapeutic approaches are needed to improve local control. Future ependymoma strategies should consider grading when stratifying treatment indications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1336-1345
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume58
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2004

Keywords

  • Adjuvant therapy for ependymoma
  • Childhood ependymoma
  • Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in ependymoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for childhood ependymoma: Final results of the first prospective AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia-Oncologia Pediatrica) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this