TY - JOUR
T1 - Hyperfractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy for childhood ependymoma
T2 - Final results of the first prospective AIEOP (Associazione Italiana di Ematologia-Oncologia Pediatrica) study
AU - Massimino, Maura
AU - Gandola, Lorenza
AU - Giangaspero, Felice
AU - Sandri, Alessandro
AU - Valagussa, Pinuccia
AU - Perilongo, Giorgio
AU - Garrè, Maria Luisa
AU - Ricardi, Umberto
AU - Forni, Marco
AU - Genitori, Lorenzo
AU - Scarzello, Giovanni
AU - Spreafico, Filippo
AU - Barra, Salvina
AU - Mascarin, Maurizio
AU - Pollo, Bianca
AU - Gardiman, Martina
AU - Cama, Armando
AU - Navarria, Pierina
AU - Brisigotti, Maurizio
AU - Collini, Paola
AU - Balter, Rita
AU - Fidani, Paola
AU - Stefanelli, Maurizio
AU - Burnelli, Roberta
AU - Potepan, Paolo
AU - Podda, Marta
AU - Sotti, Guido
AU - Madon, Enrico
PY - 2004/4/1
Y1 - 2004/4/1
N2 - Purpose A postsurgical "stage-based" protocol for ependymoma was designed. Methods and materials Children were given: (1) focal hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) if with no evidence of disease (NED), or (2) 4 courses with VEC followed by HFRT for residual disease (ED). HFRT dose was 70.4 Gy (1.1 Gy/fraction b.i.d.); VEC consisted of VCR 1.5 mg/m2 1/w, VP16 100 mg/m2/day × 3, CTX 3 g/m2 d 1. When feasible, second-look surgery was recommended. Results Sixty-three consecutive children were enrolled: 46 NED, 17 ED; the tumor was infratentorial in 47 and supratentorial in 16, with spinal metastasis in 1. Of NED patients, 35 of 46 have been treated with HFRT; 8 received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, and 3 received no treatment. Of the 17 ED patients, 9 received VEC + HFRT; violations due to postsurgical morbidity were as follows: HFRT only (2), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (3) + VEC (2), and no therapy (1). Objective responses to VEC were seen in 54%; objective responses to RT were seen in 75%. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years for all 63 children were 75% and 56%, respectively; for the NED subgroup, 82% and 65%; and for the ED subgroup, 61% and 35%, respectively. All histologies were centrally reviewed. At multivariate analysis, grading, age, and site proved significant for prognosis. Conclusions HFRT, despite the high total dose adopted, did not change the prognosis of childhood ependymoma as compared to historical series: New radiotherapeutic approaches are needed to improve local control. Future ependymoma strategies should consider grading when stratifying treatment indications.
AB - Purpose A postsurgical "stage-based" protocol for ependymoma was designed. Methods and materials Children were given: (1) focal hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) if with no evidence of disease (NED), or (2) 4 courses with VEC followed by HFRT for residual disease (ED). HFRT dose was 70.4 Gy (1.1 Gy/fraction b.i.d.); VEC consisted of VCR 1.5 mg/m2 1/w, VP16 100 mg/m2/day × 3, CTX 3 g/m2 d 1. When feasible, second-look surgery was recommended. Results Sixty-three consecutive children were enrolled: 46 NED, 17 ED; the tumor was infratentorial in 47 and supratentorial in 16, with spinal metastasis in 1. Of NED patients, 35 of 46 have been treated with HFRT; 8 received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, and 3 received no treatment. Of the 17 ED patients, 9 received VEC + HFRT; violations due to postsurgical morbidity were as follows: HFRT only (2), conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (3) + VEC (2), and no therapy (1). Objective responses to VEC were seen in 54%; objective responses to RT were seen in 75%. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 5 years for all 63 children were 75% and 56%, respectively; for the NED subgroup, 82% and 65%; and for the ED subgroup, 61% and 35%, respectively. All histologies were centrally reviewed. At multivariate analysis, grading, age, and site proved significant for prognosis. Conclusions HFRT, despite the high total dose adopted, did not change the prognosis of childhood ependymoma as compared to historical series: New radiotherapeutic approaches are needed to improve local control. Future ependymoma strategies should consider grading when stratifying treatment indications.
KW - Adjuvant therapy for ependymoma
KW - Childhood ependymoma
KW - Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in ependymoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12144289320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12144289320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.08.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.08.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 15050308
AN - SCOPUS:12144289320
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 58
SP - 1336
EP - 1345
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 5
ER -