TY - JOUR
T1 - High-risk early-stage ovarian cancer
T2 - Randomized clinical trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus whole abdominal radiotherapy
AU - Chiara, S.
AU - Conte, P. F.
AU - Franzone, P.
AU - Orsatti, M.
AU - Bruzzone, M.
AU - Rubagotti, A.
AU - Odicino, F.
AU - Rugiati, S.
AU - Carnino, F.
AU - Rosso, R.
AU - Ragni, N.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - From 1985 to 1989 70 patients with high-risk FIGO Stage I-II ovarian carcinoma entered a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy (CT: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses) versus whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) given according to the open-field technique (43.2 Gy/24 fractions to the pelvis and 30.2 Gy to the upper abdomen). Protocol violations occurred in 8 patients randomized to WAR who received CT because of their own and/or physician's decision. Since protocol compliance was poor and accrual low the study was prematurely closed. Treatment-related toxicity for patients receiving CT was mild and tolerable, consisting chiefly of controllable grade 3 emesis (71%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was experienced by 28% of patients treated with WAR; severe enteritis requiring hospitalization was observed in 2 patients. Late bowel obstruction requiring surgery was observed in 1 patient. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients died and 23 relapsed. Five-year survival was 71% and 53% (p = .16), while relapse-free survival was 74% and 50% (p = .07) for CT and WAR, respectively. Although no firm conclusion can be drawn from the present study, a short-term CT, including cisplatin, appears a safe treatment in comparison to WAR.
AB - From 1985 to 1989 70 patients with high-risk FIGO Stage I-II ovarian carcinoma entered a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy (CT: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses) versus whole abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) given according to the open-field technique (43.2 Gy/24 fractions to the pelvis and 30.2 Gy to the upper abdomen). Protocol violations occurred in 8 patients randomized to WAR who received CT because of their own and/or physician's decision. Since protocol compliance was poor and accrual low the study was prematurely closed. Treatment-related toxicity for patients receiving CT was mild and tolerable, consisting chiefly of controllable grade 3 emesis (71%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was experienced by 28% of patients treated with WAR; severe enteritis requiring hospitalization was observed in 2 patients. Late bowel obstruction requiring surgery was observed in 1 patient. At a median follow-up of 60 months, 21 patients died and 23 relapsed. Five-year survival was 71% and 53% (p = .16), while relapse-free survival was 74% and 50% (p = .07) for CT and WAR, respectively. Although no firm conclusion can be drawn from the present study, a short-term CT, including cisplatin, appears a safe treatment in comparison to WAR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028107280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028107280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 8311013
AN - SCOPUS:0028107280
SN - 0277-3732
VL - 17
SP - 72
EP - 76
JO - American Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - American Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 1
ER -