Functional differences between the two splice variants of the nucleolar transcription factor UBF: The second HMG box determines specificity of DNA binding and transcriptional activity

Anne Kuhn, Renate Voit, Victor Stefanovsky, Raymond Evers, Marco Bianchi, Ingrid Grummt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The nucleolar transcription factor UBF consists of two proteins, UBF1 and UBF2, which originate by alternative splicing. Here we show that deletion of 37 amino acids within the second of five HMG box motifs in UBF2 is important for the dual role of UBF as transcriptional activator and antirepressor. UBF1 is a potent antirepressor and transcriptional activator, whereas the ability of UBF2 to counteract histone H1-mediated repression and to stimulate ribosomal gene transcription both in vivo and in vitro is at least one order of magnitude lower. The difference in transcriptional activity between UBF1 and UBF2 is due to their different binding to the ribosomal gene promoter and enhancer. Apparently, the presence of an intact HMG box2 modulates the sequence-specific binding of UBF to rDNA control elements. However, the interaction of UBF with rDNA does not entirely depend on sequence recognition. Both UBF isoforms bind efficiently to four-way junction DNA, indicating that they recognize defined DNA structures rather than specific sequences. The results demonstrate that the HMG boxes are functionally diverse and that HMG box2 plays an important role in specific binding of UBF to rDNA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)416-424
Number of pages9
JournalEMBO Journal
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jan 15 1994

Keywords

  • Four-way junction DNA
  • HMG box proteins
  • Ribosomal genes
  • RNA polymerase I
  • Transcription factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cell Biology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functional differences between the two splice variants of the nucleolar transcription factor UBF: The second HMG box determines specificity of DNA binding and transcriptional activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this