TY - JOUR
T1 - Fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic approach and variants
T2 - Surgical technique and indications
AU - Santoro, A.
AU - Salvati, M.
AU - Vangelista, T.
AU - Delfini, R.
AU - Cantore, G. P.
PY - 2003/9
Y1 - 2003/9
N2 - Aim. In the last decade, development and refinement of skull base surgery have widened the surgical options available for treatment of mtracramal lesions. Despite the enormous advances made m microsurgical technique, the bony phase is still extremely important for achievmg optimal exposure of vascular and tumoral skull base lesions. The role of anterolateral approaches for such lesions is discussed. Methods. We collected 87 consecutive patients with 74 neoplasms and 13 vascular lesions involving the floor of the antenor and/or middle cranial fossae, cavernous sinus, orbit, petrous bone, clivus, parasellar region and infratemporal fossa operated throughout 8 and a half years by means of an anterolateral approach and we evaluated the results obtained employing different craniotomies. Results. To simplify the parameters for evaluation of outcome, we considered 2 main aspects: comparison between pre- and postoperative neurological status and the extent of tumour removal on MR imaging. For vascular lesions, we took into consideration the neurological outcome and the successful clipping of the aneurysm or disappearance of the AVM (1 case) on postoperative angiography. Satisfactory surgical results were obtained with each type of craniotomy employed (fronto-teniporo-orbito-zygomatic, fronto-temporo-orbital, fronto-temporo-zygomatic, fronto-orbito-zygomatic). Conclusion. On the whole, surgical results were satisfactory. By deliberately excluding the microsurgical aspects of the lesions treated, we can observe that the fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic approach is principally indicated for lesions requiring a multidirectional approach such as spheno-petro-clival tumours, aneurysms of the basilar tip and intracavemous lesions while the fronto-temporo-orbital approach proved excellent for more medial lesions such as meningiomas of the luberculum sellae and cramopharyngiomas. The fronto-temporo-zygomatic approach is our 1st choice for neoplasms involving the Gassenan ganglion and the intratemporal fossa. For lesions of the orbital apex, a fronto-orbito-zygomatic approach can be successfully employed. Introduction of these approaches is relatively recent but promises a further refinement of their indications and surgical technique aimed at mimmismg postoperative morbidity.
AB - Aim. In the last decade, development and refinement of skull base surgery have widened the surgical options available for treatment of mtracramal lesions. Despite the enormous advances made m microsurgical technique, the bony phase is still extremely important for achievmg optimal exposure of vascular and tumoral skull base lesions. The role of anterolateral approaches for such lesions is discussed. Methods. We collected 87 consecutive patients with 74 neoplasms and 13 vascular lesions involving the floor of the antenor and/or middle cranial fossae, cavernous sinus, orbit, petrous bone, clivus, parasellar region and infratemporal fossa operated throughout 8 and a half years by means of an anterolateral approach and we evaluated the results obtained employing different craniotomies. Results. To simplify the parameters for evaluation of outcome, we considered 2 main aspects: comparison between pre- and postoperative neurological status and the extent of tumour removal on MR imaging. For vascular lesions, we took into consideration the neurological outcome and the successful clipping of the aneurysm or disappearance of the AVM (1 case) on postoperative angiography. Satisfactory surgical results were obtained with each type of craniotomy employed (fronto-teniporo-orbito-zygomatic, fronto-temporo-orbital, fronto-temporo-zygomatic, fronto-orbito-zygomatic). Conclusion. On the whole, surgical results were satisfactory. By deliberately excluding the microsurgical aspects of the lesions treated, we can observe that the fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic approach is principally indicated for lesions requiring a multidirectional approach such as spheno-petro-clival tumours, aneurysms of the basilar tip and intracavemous lesions while the fronto-temporo-orbital approach proved excellent for more medial lesions such as meningiomas of the luberculum sellae and cramopharyngiomas. The fronto-temporo-zygomatic approach is our 1st choice for neoplasms involving the Gassenan ganglion and the intratemporal fossa. For lesions of the orbital apex, a fronto-orbito-zygomatic approach can be successfully employed. Introduction of these approaches is relatively recent but promises a further refinement of their indications and surgical technique aimed at mimmismg postoperative morbidity.
KW - Brain neoplasms, surgery
KW - Craniotomy, methods
KW - Osteotomy, methods
KW - Skull base, surgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346789120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346789120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 14618127
AN - SCOPUS:0346789120
SN - 0026-4881
VL - 47
SP - 141
EP - 147
JO - Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences
JF - Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences
IS - 3
ER -