TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluorescence in situ hybridisation in the cytological diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumours
AU - Boldorini, Renzo
AU - Paganotti, Alessia
AU - Sartori, Massimo
AU - Allegrini, Sara
AU - Miglio, Umberto
AU - Orsello, Marco
AU - Veggiani, Claudia
AU - Piano, Mario Del
AU - Monga, Guido
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Aims: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and conventional cytology in identifying bile duct stricture malignancies. Methods: Brushing samples were collected from 64 patients by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and assessed cytologically and by means of a multiprobe FISH set. The cytological diagnoses were: positive, negative and suspicious, whereas criteria for FISH positivity were: more than five polysomic cells or more than 10 trisomic cells for chromosomes 3 or 7. Results: Forty-eight of the 64 patients showed histological or clinical signs of malignancy. The sensitivity of cytology was high (77%) if suspicious caseswere considered positive, but was significantly lower than that of FISH if suspicious cases were considered negative (58% versus 90%; p
AB - Aims: To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and conventional cytology in identifying bile duct stricture malignancies. Methods: Brushing samples were collected from 64 patients by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and assessed cytologically and by means of a multiprobe FISH set. The cytological diagnoses were: positive, negative and suspicious, whereas criteria for FISH positivity were: more than five polysomic cells or more than 10 trisomic cells for chromosomes 3 or 7. Results: Forty-eight of the 64 patients showed histological or clinical signs of malignancy. The sensitivity of cytology was high (77%) if suspicious caseswere considered positive, but was significantly lower than that of FISH if suspicious cases were considered negative (58% versus 90%; p
KW - Brush cytology
KW - Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
KW - FISH
KW - Pancreatobiliary duct
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052226439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052226439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32834642c0
DO - 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32834642c0
M3 - Article
C2 - 21519286
AN - SCOPUS:80052226439
SN - 0031-3025
VL - 43
SP - 335
EP - 339
JO - Pathology
JF - Pathology
IS - 4
ER -