TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence-based diagnosis of familial non-X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy
T2 - Prevalence, inheritance and characteristics
AU - Gavazzi, A.
AU - Repetto, A.
AU - Scelsi, L.
AU - Inserra, C.
AU - Laudisa, M. L.
AU - Campana, C.
AU - Specchia, C.
AU - Dal Bello, B.
AU - Diegoli, M.
AU - Tavazzi, L.
AU - Arbustini, Eloisa
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Aims: To assess the prevalence of familial non-X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy, to diagnose early asymptomatic cases evaluate inheritance and characterize clinical phenotypes. Methods and Results: We screened 472 relatives of-104 consecutive patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy; males with X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy were excluded based on systematic immunohistochemical and molecular analysis. Relatives underwent clinical examination, electrocardiography, echocardiography and serum creatine-phosphokinase determination. Twenty-six index patients (25%) had familial disease: four youths (≤20 years) had rapidly progressive outcome and underwent emergency transplantation. In a sib-pair, the onset was with atrioventricular block. Inheritance was autosomal dominant in 15, undetermined in seven (four sib-pairs); mitochondrial DNA pathological mutations were found in four. The screening identified 23 newly diagnosed relatives in the familial group. Transplantation (P=0.04) and atrial fibrillation (P=0.04) were more frequent, and left bundle branch block (P=0.04) less frequent in index patients with familial than in those with non-familial disease. Several non-affected relatives had instrumental abnormalities potentially useful as pre-clinical markers: their prevalence was similar in both groups. Conclusions: The prevalence of familial, non X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy was 25%. The immediate benefits of screening family members of index patients was early diagnosis in unaware symptomless affected relatives.
AB - Aims: To assess the prevalence of familial non-X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy, to diagnose early asymptomatic cases evaluate inheritance and characterize clinical phenotypes. Methods and Results: We screened 472 relatives of-104 consecutive patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy; males with X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy were excluded based on systematic immunohistochemical and molecular analysis. Relatives underwent clinical examination, electrocardiography, echocardiography and serum creatine-phosphokinase determination. Twenty-six index patients (25%) had familial disease: four youths (≤20 years) had rapidly progressive outcome and underwent emergency transplantation. In a sib-pair, the onset was with atrioventricular block. Inheritance was autosomal dominant in 15, undetermined in seven (four sib-pairs); mitochondrial DNA pathological mutations were found in four. The screening identified 23 newly diagnosed relatives in the familial group. Transplantation (P=0.04) and atrial fibrillation (P=0.04) were more frequent, and left bundle branch block (P=0.04) less frequent in index patients with familial than in those with non-familial disease. Several non-affected relatives had instrumental abnormalities potentially useful as pre-clinical markers: their prevalence was similar in both groups. Conclusions: The prevalence of familial, non X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy was 25%. The immediate benefits of screening family members of index patients was early diagnosis in unaware symptomless affected relatives.
KW - Dilated cardiomyopathy
KW - Evidence-based familial
KW - Non-X-linked
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034944490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034944490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/euhj.2000.2171
DO - 10.1053/euhj.2000.2171
M3 - Article
C2 - 11133212
AN - SCOPUS:0034944490
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 22
SP - 73
EP - 81
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 1
ER -