Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 648-654 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Oncologist |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Advanced breast cancer
- Everolimus
- Hormone-receptor positive
- Real life
- Safety
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Everolimus plus exemestane in advanced breast cancer: Safety results of the BALLET study on patients previously treatedwithout and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Everolimus plus exemestane in advanced breast cancer: Safety results of the BALLET study on patients previously treatedwithout and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. / Generali, D.; Montemurro, F.; Bordonaro, R. et al.
In: Oncologist, Vol. 22, No. 6, 2017, p. 648-654.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Everolimus plus exemestane in advanced breast cancer: Safety results of the BALLET study on patients previously treatedwithout and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting
AU - Generali, D.
AU - Montemurro, F.
AU - Bordonaro, R.
AU - Mafodda, A.
AU - Romito, S.
AU - Michelotti, A.
AU - Piovano, P.
AU - Ionta, M.T.
AU - Bighin, C.
AU - Sartori, D.
AU - Frassoldati, A.
AU - Cazzaniga, M.E.
AU - Riccardi, F.
AU - Testore, F.
AU - Vici, P.
AU - Barone, C.A.
AU - Schirone, A.
AU - Piacentini, F.
AU - Nolé, F.
AU - Molino, A.
AU - Latini, L.
AU - Simoncini, E.L.
AU - Roila, F.
AU - Cognetti, F.
AU - Nuzzo, F.
AU - Foglietta, J.
AU - Minisini, A.M.
AU - Goffredo, F.
AU - Portera, G.
AU - Ascione, G.
AU - Mariani, G.
N1 - Export Date: 14 July 2017 CODEN: OCOLF Correspondence Address: Generali, D.; Department of Medical, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Breast Cancer Unit and Molecular Therapy Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Viale Concordia 1, Italy; email: dgenerali@units.it Funding details: NPC, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Funding text: We thank the patients who participated in the BALLET trial, study nurses, and clinical research associates from the individual trial centers who provided ongoing support; the investigators: Piazza Elena, A.O. Polo Univ. Luigi Sacco, Milano; Ceccherini Rita, Centro Oncologico Az. per i Serv. San. n. 1, Trieste; Farina Gabriella, Osp. Fatebenefratelli-Oftalmico, Milano; Moroni Mauro, A. O. Ospedale S. Carlo Borromeo, Milano; Tondini Carlo Alberto, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo; Cinieri Saverio, Pres. Osp. A. Perrino - ASL BR, Brindisi; Cairo Giuseppe, P.O. Vito Fazzi ASL Lecce, Lecce; Pisconti Salvatore, Pres. Osp. Centrale SS. Annunziata AUSL TA, Taranto; Palmiotti Gennaro, Osp. di Venere, Bari; Giotta Francesco, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari; Rizzi Anna, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedalieri di Brescia; Spada Massimiliano, Fondazione Istituto S. Raffaele Giuseppe Giglio Cefalü (PA); Pinotti Graziella, Pres. Osp. di Varese A.O. Osp. di Circolo, Varese; Caruso Francesco, Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia, Catania; Mattioli Rodolfo, Az. Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Fano (PU); Aieta Michele, IRCCS CROB, Rionero in Vulture (PZ); Graiff Claudio, Az. Sanit. dell’Alto Adige - Comprensorio Sanit. di Bolzano; Verusio Claudio, P.O. di Saronno Az. Osp. Osp. di Circolo di Busto Arsizio, Saronno (VA); Aschele Carlo, Pres. Osp. S. Andrea - Sede Felettino, La Spezia; Vicario Giovanni, P.O. di Castelfranco Veneto, Castelfranco Veneto (TV); Ferro Antonella, P.O. Osp. di Trento Az. Provinciale Servizi Sanitari, Trento; Alabiso Oscar, A.O. Maggiore della Caritá, Novara; Pavesi Lorenzo, Istituto Scientifico di Pavia Fond. Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia; Fava Sergio, Osp. Civile di Legnano, Milano; Pazzola Antonio, Pres. Osp. Osp. Civile SS. Annunziata, Sassari; Ruggeri Enzo Maria, Complesso Osp. di Belcolle, Viterbo; Tralongo Paolo, P.O. Osp. Umberto I, Siracusa; Giordano Monica, P.O. Osp. S. Anna, Como; D’Arco Alfonso Maria, P.O. Andrea Tortora, Nocera Inferiore (SA); Tinessa Vincenza, A.O. G.Rummo, Benevento; Gamucci Maria Teresa, P.O. Osp. S.S. Trinitá di Sora ASL Frosinone, Sora (FR); Marchetti Paolo, A.O. Sant’Andrea, Roma; Cortesi Enrico, A.O. Policlinico Umberto I8, Roma; Portarena Ilaria, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma; Danese Saverio, Osp. Ostetrico Ginecologico S. Anna, Torino; Amoroso Domenico, Osp. Versilia, Lido di Camaiore (LU); Cammilluzzi Eugenio, Osp. Sandro Pertini, Roma; Santoro Armando, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano (MI); Bretti Sergio, Osp. Civile di Ivrea; Farci Daniele, Osp. Oncologico A. Businco, Cagliari; Ianniello Giovanni Pietro, Az. Osp. Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano di Caserta; Palazzo Salvatore, P.O. Mariano Santo A.O. di Cosenza, Cosenza; Russo Antonio, Az. Osp.-Univ. Policlinico P. Giaccone, Palermo; Rosti Giovanni, Osp. Regionale Ca’ Foncello, Treviso; Marzano Nicola, P.O. S. Paolo, Bari;Maiello Evaristo, Osp. Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG); Mairone Lorenza, Pres. Osp. Evangelico Valdese- ASL 1 Torino, Torino; Maisano Roberto, Pres. Ospedali Riuniti A.O. Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria; Battaglia Caterina, P.O. Ciaccio-De Lellis Az. Osp. Pugliese-Ciaccio, Catanzaro; Grasso Donatella, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Gridelli Cesare, Az. Osp. S.G. Moscati, Avellino; Garrone Ornella A.O. S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo; Serravezza Giuseppe, P.O. F. Ferrari, Casarano (LE); Merlini Laura, P.O. San Bortolo, Vicenza; Ghiotto Cristina, Istituto Oncologico Veneto I.R.C.C.S., Padova; Saracchini Silvana, A.O. Santa Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone; Filippelli Gianfranco, P.O. San Francesco di Paola, Paola (CS); De Censi Andrea, Ospedale E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genova; Ficorella Corrado, P.O. S. Salvatore, L’Aquila; Boni Corrado, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia; Di Stefano Pia, Presidio Ospedaliero Spirito Santo, Pescara; Donadio Michela, A.O. Cittá della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino; Tagliaferri Pierosandro, Fond. per la Ricerca e la Cura dei Tumori “T. Campanella”, Catanzaro; Di Leo Angelo, P.O. Osp. Misericordia e Dolce, Prato; De Placido Sabino, Az. Osp. Univ. Policlinico Federico II, Napoli; Sarobba Giuseppina, Az. Osp.- Univ. di Sassari, Sassari; Castiglione Federico, Osp. San Lazzaro ASL CN2, Alba (CN); Pisano Agata, Osp. S. Maria delle Grazie, Pozzuoli (NA); Fioretto Luisa, Stab. Osp. S. Maria Annunziata - P.O. Sud-Est, Bagno a Ripoli (FI); Soto Parra Héctor, P.O. Gaspare Rodolico, Catania; Zampa Germano, Osp. P.T.P. Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma; Iacono Carmelo, Presidio Ospedaliero Maria Paternó Arezzo ASP Ragusa, Ragusa; Montesarchio Vincenzo, P.O. D.Cotugno, Napoli; Barduagni Mario, P.O. L. Spolverini, Ariccia (RM); Benasso Marco, Osp. S. Paolo ASL 2 Savonese, Savona; Giustini Lucio, P.O. A. Murri - Area Vasta n. 4 ASUR Marche, Femio (AP); Siena Salvatore, Az. Osp. Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milano; Barni Sandro, P.O. di Treviglio, Treviglio (BG); Bracarda Sergio, P.O. Area Aretina Nord S. Donato AUSL 8 AREZZO; Scinto Fedele, Ospedale Generale S.G. Calibita - Fatebenefratelli, Roma; Visini Marilena, Osp. A. Manzoni, Lecco Milandri Carlo P.O. S. Giuseppe, Empoli (FI); Gianni Lorenzo, P.O. Osp. Infermi AUSL Rimini; Artale Salvatore, A.O. S. Antonio Abate, Gallarate (VA); Gianni Luca, Istituto S. Raffaele - IRCCS, Milano; Ciardiello Fortunato, Az. Osp. Univ. Policl. Seconda Universitá di Napoli, Napoli; Tienghi Amelia, P.O. S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna; Tortora Giampaolo, Ospedale Borgo Roma Az. Osp. Univ. Int. Verona, Verona; Brandes Alba, Osp. Bellaria, Bologna; Pasini Felice, Ospedale Civile - Santa Maria della Misericordia, Rovigo; Adamo Vincenzo, Osp. Papardo A.O.R. Papardo-Piemonte, Messina; Clerico Mario, Alberto Osp. degli Infermi di Biella; Cavazzini Giovanna, P.O. di Mantova A.O. C. Poma, Mantova; Gaion Fernando, Presidio Ospedaliero di Camposampiero, Camposampiero (PD); Scambia Giovanni, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma; Airoldi Mario, A.O. Cittá della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino; Editorial support was provided by Content Ed Net, with the helpful contribution in drafting the test by Lisa Argnani, and was funded by Novartis Farma SpA (Origgio - IT). Statistical support was provided by Opis srl and was funded by Novartis Farma SpA Origgio (Origgio - IT). This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. No grant number is applicable. References: Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2) (2014) Ann Oncol, 25, pp. 1871-1888; Śtudentová, H., Vitásková, D., Melichar, B., Safety of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer (2016) Expert Opin Drug Saf, 15, pp. 1075-1085; Baselga, J., Campone, M., Piccart, M., Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (2012) N Engl J Med, 366, pp. 520-529; Higgins, M.J., Baselga, J., Targeted therapies for breast cancer (2011) J Clin Invest, 121, pp. 3797-3803; Chia, S., Gradishar, W., Mauriac, L., Doubleblind, randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: Results from EFECT (2008) J Clin Oncol, 26, pp. 1664-1670; Turner, N.C., Ro, J., André, F., Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (2015) N Engl J Med, 373, pp. 209-219; Gnant, M., The role of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (2013) Curr Oncol Rep, 15, pp. 14-23; Jerusalem, G., Rorive, A., Collignon, J., Use of mTOR inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer: An evaluation of factors that influence patient outcomes (2014) Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press), 6, pp. 43-57; Baselga, J., Campone, M., Piccart, M., Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (2012) N Engl J Med, 366, pp. 520-529; Jerusalem, G., Mariani, G., Ciruelos, E.M., Safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer progressing on prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors:Primary results of a phase IIIb, open-label, singlearm, expanded-access multicenter trial (BALLET) (2016) Ann Oncol, 27, pp. 1719-1725; Generali, D., Venturini, S., Rognoni, C., A network meta-analysis of everolimus plus exemestane versus chemotherapy in the first- and second-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (2015) Breast Cancer Res Treat, 152, pp. 95-117; Rugo, H.S., Hortobagyi, G.N., Yao, J., Meta-analysis of stomatitis in clinical studies of everolimus:Incidence and relationship with efficacy (2016) Ann Oncol, 27, pp. 519-525; Willemsen, A.E., Grutter, J.C., Gerritsen, W.R., mTOR inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease in cancer patients: Comprehensive review and a practical management algorithm (2016) Int J Cancer, 138, pp. 2312-2321; Rugo, H.S., Pritchard, K.I., Gnant, M., Incidence and time course of everolimus-related adverse events in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer:Insights from BOLERO-2 (2014) Ann Oncol, 25, pp. 808-815; Del Mastro, L., Cazzaniga, M., Solidoro, P., Everolimus-based therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2(-) advanced breast cancer:Management considerations (2015) Future Oncol, 11, pp. 2251-2254
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background. The BALLET study was an open-label, multicenter, expanded access study designed to allow treatment with everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer progressed following prior endocrine therapy. A post hoc analysis to evaluate if previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting affects the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane was conducted on the Italian subset, as it represented the major part of the patients enrolled (54%). Patients and Methods. One thousand one hundred and fiftyone Italian patients were included in the present post hoc analysis, which focused on two sets of patients: patients who never received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (36.1%) and patients who received at least one chemotherapy treatment in the metastatic setting (63.9%). Results. One thousand one hundred and sixteen patients (97.0%) prematurely discontinued the study drug, and the main reasons reported were disease progression (39.1%), local reimbursement of everolimus (31.1%), and adverse events (AEs) (16.1%). The median duration of study treatment exposure was 139.5 days for exemestane and 135.0 days for everolimus. At least one AE was experienced by 92.5% of patients. The incidence of everolimus-related AEs was higher (83.9%) when compared with those that occurred with exemestane (29.1%), and the most commonly reported everolimus-related AE was stomatitis (51.3%). However, no significant difference in terms of safety related to the combination occurred between patients without and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Conclusion. Real-life data of the Italian patients BALLET-related cohort were an adequate setting to state that previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. © AlphaMed Press 2017.
AB - Background. The BALLET study was an open-label, multicenter, expanded access study designed to allow treatment with everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer progressed following prior endocrine therapy. A post hoc analysis to evaluate if previous chemotherapy in the metastatic setting affects the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane was conducted on the Italian subset, as it represented the major part of the patients enrolled (54%). Patients and Methods. One thousand one hundred and fiftyone Italian patients were included in the present post hoc analysis, which focused on two sets of patients: patients who never received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (36.1%) and patients who received at least one chemotherapy treatment in the metastatic setting (63.9%). Results. One thousand one hundred and sixteen patients (97.0%) prematurely discontinued the study drug, and the main reasons reported were disease progression (39.1%), local reimbursement of everolimus (31.1%), and adverse events (AEs) (16.1%). The median duration of study treatment exposure was 139.5 days for exemestane and 135.0 days for everolimus. At least one AE was experienced by 92.5% of patients. The incidence of everolimus-related AEs was higher (83.9%) when compared with those that occurred with exemestane (29.1%), and the most commonly reported everolimus-related AE was stomatitis (51.3%). However, no significant difference in terms of safety related to the combination occurred between patients without and with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Conclusion. Real-life data of the Italian patients BALLET-related cohort were an adequate setting to state that previous chemotherapy did not affect the safety profile of the combination regimen of everolimus and exemestane. © AlphaMed Press 2017.
KW - Advanced breast cancer
KW - Everolimus
KW - Hormone-receptor positive
KW - Real life
KW - Safety
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0461
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0461
M3 - Article
SN - 1083-7159
VL - 22
SP - 648
EP - 654
JO - Oncologist
JF - Oncologist
IS - 6
ER -